Literature DB >> 17184628

Multicentered European study on safety and effectiveness of the On-X prosthetic heart valve: intermediate follow-up.

George M Palatianos1, Axel M Laczkovics, Paul Simon, Jose Luis Pomar, Dietrich E Birnbaum, Hans H Greve, Axel Haverich.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to determine the safety and effectiveness of the On-X valve, a novel mechanical valve substitute.
METHODS: Eleven centers participated in a European, multicentered, longitudinal, nonrandomized study of the On-X valve performance. Isolated aortic or mitral valve replacement with an On-X valve was studied in 301 patients. Aortic valve replacement was performed in 184 patients (average follow-up, 5.0 years), whereas mitral valve replacement was performed in 117 patients (average follow-up, 4.4 years).
RESULTS: In patients with aortic valve replacement, mean transvalvular pressure gradients ranged from 8.3 to 4.7 mm Hg and effective orifice areas from 1.5 to 2.7 cm2, for 19-mm through 25-mm valves, respectively. After mitral valve replacement, mean gradient was 4.2 mm Hg and effective orifice area by pressure half-time was 2.6 cm2 regardless of valve size. Hemolysis was low, with postoperative serum lactate dehydrogenase at 225 +/- 41 IU (mean +/- standard deviation) or 253 +/- 65 IU, after aortic valve replacement or mitral valve replacement, respectively (upper normal value, 250 IU). At 1 year or greater postoperatively, 91.6% of patients after aortic valve replacement and 84.6% after mitral valve replacement were in New York Heart Association functional class I or II. Adverse event rates in percent per patient-year after aortic valve replacement or mitral valve replacement were thromboembolism, 0.88 or 1.76; thrombosis, 0.11 or 0.20; bleeding, 0.77 or 1.96, respectively. Late mortality was 1.97% or 2.55%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: At the intermediate follow-up, the On-X valve exhibited improved hemodynamics, low hemolysis with in-range lactate dehydrogenase, and low adverse event rates, particularly in the aortic position.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17184628     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.08.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  6 in total

1.  Twelve years of experience with the ATS mechanical heart valve prostheses.

Authors:  Shinichiro Taniguchi; Koji Hashizume; Tsuneo Ariyoshi; Yoichi Hisata; Kazuyoshi Tanigawa; Takashi Miura; Tomohiro Odate; Seiji Matsukuma; Shun Nakaji; Kiyoyuki Eishi
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-07-06

2.  A turbulence in vitro assessment of On-X and St Jude Medical prostheses.

Authors:  Hoda Hatoum; Pablo Maureira; Lakshmi Prasad Dasi
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Anticoagulation dilemma in a high-risk patient with On-X valves.

Authors:  Ami M Karkar; Manuel R Castresana; Nadine Odo; Shvetank Agarwal
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

Review 4.  Cardiac prostheses-related hemolytic anemia.

Authors:  Mohamad Alkhouli; Ali Farooq; Ronald S Go; Sudarshan Balla; Chalak Berzingi
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 5.  Anticoagulation for prosthetic valves.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Kaneko; Sary F Aranki
Journal:  Thrombosis       Date:  2013-11-04

6.  On-X versus St Jude Medical Regent mechanical aortic valve prostheses: early haemodynamics.

Authors:  Robert Xu; Mohammad Rahnavardi; Bradley Pitman; Masoumeh Shirazi; Robert Stuklis; James Edwards; Michael Worthington
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2017-02-23
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.