Literature DB >> 17184365

The day after: effects of vocal interactions on territory defence in nightingales.

Rouven Schmidt1, Valentin Amrhein, Hansjoerg P Kunc, Marc Naguib.   

Abstract

1. Models on territory acquisition and tenure predict that territorial animals benefit by adjusting territorial defence behaviour to previous challenges they had experienced within the socially complex environment of communication networks. 2. Here, we addressed such issues of social cognition by investigating persisting effects of vocal contests on territory defence behaviour in nightingales Luscinia megarhynchos (Brehm). 3. Using interactive playback during nocturnal song of subjects, a rival was simulated to countersing either aggressively (by song overlapping) or moderately (by song alternating) from outside the subjects' territory. Thereby, the time-specific singing strategy provided an experimentally controlled source of information on the motivation of an unfamiliar rival. 4. Expecting that nightingales integrate information with time, the same rival was simulated to return as a moderately singing intruder on the following morning. 5. The results show that the vigour with which male nightingales responded to the simulated intrusion of an opponent during the day depended on the nature of the nocturnal vocal interaction experienced several hours before. 6. Males that had received the song overlapping playback the preceding night approached the simulated intruder more quickly and closer and sang more songs near the loudspeaker than did males that had received a song alternating playback. 7. This adjustment of territory defence strategies depending on information from prior signalling experience suggests that integrating information with time plays an important part in territory defence by affecting a male's decision making in a communication network.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17184365     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01182.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  7 in total

Review 1.  What do territory owners defend against?

Authors:  Martin Hinsch; Jan Komdeur
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Effects of personality on territory defence in communication networks: a playback experiment with radio-tagged great tits.

Authors:  Mathieu Amy; Philipp Sprau; Piet de Goede; Marc Naguib
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Long-term memory for affiliates in ravens.

Authors:  Markus Boeckle; Thomas Bugnyar
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Sex-specific responses to territorial intrusions in a communication network: Evidence from radio-tagged great tits.

Authors:  Lysanne Snijders; Kees van Oers; Marc Naguib
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Anthropogenic noise affects male house wren response to but not detection of territorial intruders.

Authors:  Erin E Grabarczyk; Sharon A Gill
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  How a songbird with a continuous singing style modulates its song when territorially challenged.

Authors:  Nicole Geberzahn; Thierry Aubin
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2013-08-18       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Effects of supplementary feeding on interspecific dominance hierarchies in garden birds.

Authors:  Megan L Francis; Kate E Plummer; Bethany A Lythgoe; Catriona Macallan; Thomas E Currie; Jonathan D Blount
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.