Literature DB >> 17184351

Modelling population redistribution in a leaf beetle: an evaluation of alternative dispersal functions.

Daniel S Chapman1, Calvin Dytham, Geoff S Oxford.   

Abstract

1. Dispersal is a fundamental ecological process, so spatial models require realistic dispersal kernels. We compare five different forms for the dispersal kernel of the tansy beetle Chrysolina graminis moving between patches of its host-plant (tansy Tanacetum vulgare) in a riparian landscape. 2. Multi-patch mark-recapture data were collected every 2 weeks over 2 years within a large network of patches and from 2226 beetles. Dispersal was common (28.4% of 880 recaptures after a fortnight) and was more likely over longer intervals, out of small patches, for females and during flooding. Interpatch movement rates did not differ between years and exhibited no density dependence. Dispersal distances were similar for males and females, in both years and over all intervals, with a median dispersal distance of just 9.8 m, although a maximum of 856 m was recorded. 3. A model of dispersal, where patches competed for dispersers based on their size and distance from the beetle's source patch (scaled by the dispersal kernel) was fitted to the field data with a maximum likelihood procedure and each of five alternative kernels. The best fitting had relatively extended tails of long-distance dispersal, while Gaussian and negative exponential kernels performed worst. 4. The model suggests that females disperse more commonly than males and that both are strongly attracted to large patches but do not differ between years, which are consistent with the empirical results. Model-predicted emigration and immigration rates and dispersal phenologies match those observed, suggesting that the model captured the major drivers of tansy beetle dispersal. 5. Although negative exponential and Gaussian kernels are widely used for their simplicity, we suggest that these should not be the models of automatic choice, and that fat-tailed kernels with relatively higher proportions of long-distance dispersal may be more realistic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17184351     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01172.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  4 in total

1.  Landscape and fine-scale movements of a leaf beetle: the importance of boundary behaviour.

Authors:  Daniel S Chapman; Calvin Dytham; Geoff S Oxford
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-07-28       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Invasion dynamics of a fish-free landscape by brown trout (Salmo trutta).

Authors:  Jacques Labonne; Matthias Vignon; Etienne Prévost; Frédéric Lecomte; Julian J Dodson; Renaud Kaeuffer; Jean-Christophe Aymes; Marc Jarry; Philippe Gaudin; Patrick Davaine; Edward Beall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Dispersal variability and associated population-level consequences in tree-killing bark beetles.

Authors:  Markus Kautz; Muhammad Ali Imron; Kai Dworschak; Reinhard Schopf
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 3.600

4.  How do climate-linked sex ratios and dispersal limit range boundaries?

Authors:  Maria Boyle; Lisa E Schwanz; Jim Hone; Arthur Georges
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 2.964

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.