Literature DB >> 17184349

Prior knowledge about spatial pattern affects patch assessment rather than movement between patches in tactile-feeding mallard.

Raymond H G Klaassen1, Bart A Nolet, Casper H A VAN Leeuwen.   

Abstract

1. Heterogeneity in food abundance allows a forager to concentrate foraging effort in patches that are rich in food. This might be problematic when food is cryptic, as the content of patches is unknown prior to foraging. In such case knowledge about the spatial pattern in the distribution of food might be beneficial as this enables a forager to estimate the content of surrounding patches. A forager can benefit from this pre-harvest information about the food distribution by regulating time in patches and/or movement between patches. 2. We conducted an experiment with mallard Anas platyrhynchos foraging in environments with random, regular, and clumped spatial configurations of full and empty patches. An assessment model was used to predict the time in patches for different spatial distributions, in which a mallard is predicted to remain in a patch until its potential intake rate drops to the average intake rate that can be achieved in the environment. A movement model was used to predict lengths of interpatch movements for different spatial distributions, in which a mallard is predicted to travel to the patch where it expects the highest intake rate. 3. Consistent with predictions, in the clumped distribution mallard spent less time in an empty patch when the previously visited neighbouring patch had been empty than when it had been full. This effect was not observed for the random distribution. This shows that mallard use pre-harvest information on spatial pattern to improve patch assessment. Patch assessment could not be evaluated for the regular distribution. 4. Movements that started in an empty patch were longer than movements that started in a full patch. Contrary to model predictions this effect was observed for all spatial distributions, rather than for the clumped distribution only. In this experiment mallard did not regulate movement in relation to pattern. 5. An explanation for the result that pre-harvest information on spatial pattern affected patch assessment rather than movement is that mallard move to the nearest patch where the expected intake rate is higher than the critical value, rather than to the patch where the highest intake rate is expected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17184349     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01184.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  4 in total

1.  Animal movement in dynamic landscapes: interaction between behavioural strategies and resource distributions.

Authors:  David A Roshier; Veronica A J Doerr; Erik D Doerr
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Nonlinear effects of food aggregation on interference competition in mallards.

Authors:  Abel Gyimesi; Erica P van Rooij; Bart A Nolet
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  Determination of foraging thresholds and effects of application on energetic carrying capacity for waterfowl.

Authors:  Heath M Hagy; Richard M Kaminski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Diel movement of brown trout, Salmo trutta, is reduced in dense populations with high site fidelity.

Authors:  Ondřej Slavík; Pavel Horký; Matúš Maciak; Petra Horká; Iva Langrová
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 2.912

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.