L Belle1, J Labarere, M Fourny, J P Cambou, N Danchin. 1. Réseau des urgences coronariennes (Resurcor), réseau nord-alpin des urgences, centre hospitalier de la région d'Annecy, Annecy, France. lbelle@ch-annecy.fr
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare processes of care for acute myocardial infarction among patients admitted to alpine vs other French hospitals. METHODS: Prospective observational study of patients with ST-elevation and non ST-elevation myocardial infarction of less than 48 hours hospitalized in 369 intensive care units in November 2000. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were enrolled in nine alpine hospitals and 2265 patients in 360 other French hospitals. Patients baseline characteristics did not differ between the two groups with the exception of ST-elevation myocardial infarction which was less frequent in patients admitted to alpine hospitals (71 vs. 83%, P = 0.02). Patients living in the alpine area were less likely to be admitted to hospitals with on-site cardiac catheterization facilities (42 vs. 60%, P < 0.01) although the use of primary (20%) and rescue (24%) percutaneous coronary intervention did not differ significantly between the two groups. There were no differences in the use of medical treatments between the two groups with the exception of low-molecular-weight heparin. The risk of in-hospital death and complications did not differ significantly between the two groups while the risk of death at one year was lower in patients admitted to alpine hospitals (5 vs. 16%, P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: In 2000, a lower proportion of patients living in the alpine area had access to hospitals with cardiac catheterization facilities compared to other French patients. This finding supports the creation of an additional cardiac catheterization laboratory with experienced operators performing percutaneous coronary interventions 24 hours/7 days and the implementation of an emergency medical care network for acute coronary syndromes in the alpine area.
OBJECTIVE: To compare processes of care for acute myocardial infarction among patients admitted to alpine vs other French hospitals. METHODS: Prospective observational study of patients with ST-elevation and non ST-elevation myocardial infarction of less than 48 hours hospitalized in 369 intensive care units in November 2000. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were enrolled in nine alpine hospitals and 2265 patients in 360 other French hospitals. Patients baseline characteristics did not differ between the two groups with the exception of ST-elevation myocardial infarction which was less frequent in patients admitted to alpine hospitals (71 vs. 83%, P = 0.02). Patients living in the alpine area were less likely to be admitted to hospitals with on-site cardiac catheterization facilities (42 vs. 60%, P < 0.01) although the use of primary (20%) and rescue (24%) percutaneous coronary intervention did not differ significantly between the two groups. There were no differences in the use of medical treatments between the two groups with the exception of low-molecular-weight heparin. The risk of in-hospital death and complications did not differ significantly between the two groups while the risk of death at one year was lower in patients admitted to alpine hospitals (5 vs. 16%, P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: In 2000, a lower proportion of patients living in the alpine area had access to hospitals with cardiac catheterization facilities compared to other French patients. This finding supports the creation of an additional cardiac catheterization laboratory with experienced operators performing percutaneous coronary interventions 24 hours/7 days and the implementation of an emergency medical care network for acute coronary syndromes in the alpine area.