Literature DB >> 17183624

Use of ethidium bromide monoazide for quantification of viable and dead mixed bacterial flora from fish fillets by polymerase chain reaction.

Jung-Lim Lee1, Robert E Levin.   

Abstract

Ethidium bromide monoazide (EMA) was utilized to selectively allow conventional PCR amplification of target DNA from viable but not dead cells from a broth culture of bacterial mixed flora derived from cod fillets. The universal primers designated DG74 and RW01 that amplify a 370-bp sequence of a highly conserved region of all eubacterial 16S rDNA were used for the PCR. The use of 10 microg/ml or less of EMA did not inhibit the PCR amplification of DNA derived from viable bacteria. The minimum amount of EMA to completely inhibit the PCR amplification of DNA derived from dead bacterial cells was 0.8 microg/ml. Amplification of target DNA from only viable cells in a suspension with dead cells was selectively accomplished by first treating the cells with 1 microg/ml of EMA. A standard curve was generated relating the intensity of fluorescence of DNA bands to the log of CFU of mixed bacterial cultures for rapidly assessing the number of genomic targets per PCR derived from the number of CFU. A linear range of DNA amplification was exhibited from 1 x 10(2) to 1 x 10(5) genomic targets per PCR. The viable/dead cell discrimination with the EMA-PCR method was evaluated by comparison with plate counts following freezing and thawing. Thawing frozen cell suspensions initially containing 1 x 10(5) CFU/ml at 4, 20, and 37 degrees C yielded a 0.8 log reduction in the number of viable cells determined by both plate counts and EMA-PCR. In contrast, thawing for 5 min at 70 degrees C resulted in a 5 log reduction in CFU derived from plate counts (no CFU detected) whereas the EMA-PCR procedure resulted in only a 2.8 log reduction in genomic targets, possibly reflecting greater damage to enzymes or ribosomes at 70 degrees C to a minority of the mixed population compared to membrane damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17183624     DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2006.04.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Microbiol Methods        ISSN: 0167-7012            Impact factor:   2.363


  6 in total

Review 1.  Dead or alive: molecular assessment of microbial viability.

Authors:  Gerard A Cangelosi; John S Meschke
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Toward a Molecular Understanding of the Antibacterial Mechanism of Copper-Bearing Titanium Alloys against Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Mei Li; Zheng Ma; Ye Zhu; Hong Xia; Mengyu Yao; Xiao Chu; Xiaolan Wang; Ke Yang; Mingying Yang; Yu Zhang; Chuanbin Mao
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 9.933

3.  Metagenomics and metatranscriptomics: windows on CF-associated viral and microbial communities.

Authors:  Yan Wei Lim; Robert Schmieder; Matthew Haynes; Dana Willner; Mike Furlan; Merry Youle; Katelynn Abbott; Robert Edwards; Jose Evangelista; Douglas Conrad; Forest Rohwer
Journal:  J Cyst Fibros       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Purifying the impure: sequencing metagenomes and metatranscriptomes from complex animal-associated samples.

Authors:  Yan Wei Lim; Matthew Haynes; Mike Furlan; Charles E Robertson; J Kirk Harris; Forest Rohwer
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  Multipurpose assessment for the quantification of Vibrio spp. and total bacteria in fish and seawater using multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  Ji Yeun Kim; Jung-Lim Lee
Journal:  J Sci Food Agric       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 3.638

6.  Different methods to quantify Listeria monocytogenes biofilms cells showed different profile in their viability.

Authors:  Lizziane Kretli Winkelströter; Elaine C P De Martinis
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 2.476

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.