Claudia Thomas1, Michaela Benzeval, Stephen Stansfeld. 1. Institute of Child Health, Centre for Paediatric Epidemiology and Biostatistics, 30 Guilford Street, London, UK. c.thomas@ich.ucl.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore the extent to which the mental health effects of transitions into unemployment, or other forms of non-employment, and vice versa, are mediated by financial changes. METHODS: Longitudinal analysis of the British Household Panel Survey from 1991 to 2000. There were 89,264 person-years of observation from 14,686 individuals aged > or =16 years. Main outcome measure was psychological distress measured by the 12-item General Health Questionnaire. RESULTS: Transitions to unemployment were associated with increased risk of psychological distress for men (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 3.15 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.50 to 3.98)) and for women (OR 2.60 (95% CI 1.97 to 3.43)). Women who left work to look after the family were also more likely to experience psychological distress (OR 1.72 (95% CI 1.45 to 2.05)). A reduced risk of psychological distress was seen for transitions from unemployment to paid employment for men (OR 0.52 (95% CI 0.41 to 0.68)) and for women (OR 0.68 (95% CI 0.69 to 1.40)). Financial difficulty partially mediated these relationships: men who became unemployed and were worse off financially were more likely to experience psychological distress (OR 4.19 (95% CI 3.20 to 5.50)) than men who were not (OR 1.48 (95% CI 0.95 to 2.33)). Conversely, the beneficial health effect for people who left unemployment and became employed was confined to those who were better off financially (OR 0.34 (0.25 to 0.48) for men). CONCLUSIONS: Changes in employment status have both direct and indirect effects, through changes in financial circumstances, on subsequent psychological distress. The results support the view that the direction of causation runs from employment transitions to financial difficulties and psychological distress.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the extent to which the mental health effects of transitions into unemployment, or other forms of non-employment, and vice versa, are mediated by financial changes. METHODS: Longitudinal analysis of the British Household Panel Survey from 1991 to 2000. There were 89,264 person-years of observation from 14,686 individuals aged > or =16 years. Main outcome measure was psychological distress measured by the 12-item General Health Questionnaire. RESULTS: Transitions to unemployment were associated with increased risk of psychological distress for men (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 3.15 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.50 to 3.98)) and for women (OR 2.60 (95% CI 1.97 to 3.43)). Women who left work to look after the family were also more likely to experience psychological distress (OR 1.72 (95% CI 1.45 to 2.05)). A reduced risk of psychological distress was seen for transitions from unemployment to paid employment for men (OR 0.52 (95% CI 0.41 to 0.68)) and for women (OR 0.68 (95% CI 0.69 to 1.40)). Financial difficulty partially mediated these relationships: men who became unemployed and were worse off financially were more likely to experience psychological distress (OR 4.19 (95% CI 3.20 to 5.50)) than men who were not (OR 1.48 (95% CI 0.95 to 2.33)). Conversely, the beneficial health effect for people who left unemployment and became employed was confined to those who were better off financially (OR 0.34 (0.25 to 0.48) for men). CONCLUSIONS: Changes in employment status have both direct and indirect effects, through changes in financial circumstances, on subsequent psychological distress. The results support the view that the direction of causation runs from employment transitions to financial difficulties and psychological distress.
Authors: Anne W Taylor; Catherine Chittleborough; Tiffany K Gill; Helen Winefield; Fran Baum; Janet E Hiller; Robert Goldney; Graeme Tucker; Graeme Hugo Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2011-02-25 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: Gun-Mette B Røsand; Kari Slinning; Malin Eberhard-Gran; Espen Røysamb; Kristian Tambs Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2012-01-22 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Diana Frasquilho; Margarida Gaspar Matos; Ferdinand Salonna; Diogo Guerreiro; Cláudia C Storti; Tânia Gaspar; José M Caldas-de-Almeida Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2016-02-03 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Daniela de Assumpção; Caroline Senicato; Regina Mara Fisberg; Ana Maria Canesqui; Marilisa Berti de Azevedo Barros Journal: Rev Saude Publica Date: 2018-05-03 Impact factor: 2.106