Literature DB >> 17182668

Judgments of infant pain: the impact of caregiver identity and infant age.

Rebecca R Pillai Riddell1, Kenneth D Craig.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether caregiver judgments of infant pain would vary systematically with different infant caregiver groups and infant age.
METHODS: A total of 123 caregivers (41 parents, 41 in patient nurses, 41 pediatricians) viewed videotapes of the vigorous behavioral responses of healthy infants (aged 2, 4, 6, 12, and 18 months) to a routine immunization injection and provided ratings of both the affective distress and pain intensity observed.
RESULTS: A principal components analysis of affective and intensity ratings yielded a weighted pain summary score for each injection event. Older infants were attributed significantly more pain than younger infants, even though the vigor of the behavioral reactions was experimentally controlled across age groups. A profile analysis contrasting observer groups indicated that pediatricians attributed significantly lower levels of pain than parents, while nurses were intermediate to the other groups, not significantly differing from either group. These systematic differences in judgments were consistent across infant age groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings reveal systematic sources of significant variations in observer judgments of infant pain. Despite an absence of differences in the behavioral reactions of the children, both the type of caregiver and their knowledge of the child's age systematically influenced attributions of pain to infants. This work suggests the important role of caregiver role variation and perceived developmental maturity as determinants of infant pain judgments and highlights potential areas of difficulty in controlling the unnecessary suffering of infants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17182668     DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsl049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol        ISSN: 0146-8693


  12 in total

1.  Examining nurse empathy for infant procedural pain: Testing a new video measure.

Authors:  Margot Latimer; Philip Jackson; Celeste Johnston; Jocelyn Vine
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.037

2.  Parent, Dentist, and Independent Rater Assessment of Child Distress During Preventive Dental Visits.

Authors:  Travis M Nelson; Colleen E Huebner; Amy S Kim; JoAnna M Scott
Journal:  J Dent Child (Chic)       Date:  2016

3.  Putting pain assessment into practice: why is it so painful?

Authors:  Linda S Franck; Elizabeth Bruce
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.037

Review 4.  Assessing pain in infancy: the caregiver context.

Authors:  R Pillai Riddell; Nicole Racine
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.037

5.  Understanding caregiver judgments of infant pain: contrasts of parents, nurses and pediatricians.

Authors:  Rebecca R Pillai Riddell; Rachel E Horton; Jessica Hillgrove; Kenneth D Craig
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.037

6.  Do we feel the same empathy for loved and hated peers?

Authors:  Giulia Bucchioni; Thierry Lelard; Said Ahmaidi; Olivier Godefroy; Pierre Krystkowiak; Harold Mouras
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The role of infant pain behaviour in predicting parent pain ratings.

Authors:  Rebecca Pillai Riddell; David B Flora; Sara Stevens; Saul Greenberg; Hartley Garfield
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.037

8.  Interpersonal behavior in anticipation of pain: a naturalistic study of behavioral mimicry prior to surgery.

Authors:  Claire E Ashton-James; Joshua M Tybur; Tymour Forouzanfar
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2017-06-13

9.  Pediatric pain: prevalence, assessment, and management in a teaching hospital.

Authors:  M B M Linhares; F N P Doca; F E Martinez; A P P Carlotti; R G M Cassiano; L I Pfeifer; C A Funayama; L R G Rossi; G A Finley
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 2.590

10.  Oral sweet solution to prevent pain during neonatal hip examination: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Emma Olsson; Miriam Pettersson; Mats Eriksson; Andreas Ohlin
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 2.299

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.