Literature DB >> 17182604

The sensitivity of the alkaline comet assay in detecting DNA lesions induced by X rays, gamma rays and alpha particles.

U Rössler1, S Hornhardt, C Seidl, E Müller-Laue, L Walsh, W Panzer, E Schmid, R Senekowitsch-Schmidtke, M Gomolka.   

Abstract

Experiments were designed and performed in order to investigate whether or not the different cellular energy deposition patterns of photon radiation with different energies (29 kV, 220 kV X rays; Co-60, Cs-137-gamma-rays) and alpha-radiation from an Am-241 source differ in DNA damage induction capacity in human cells. For this purpose, the alkaline comet assay (single cell gel electrophoresis) was applied to measure the amount of DNA damage in relation to the dose received. The comet assay data for the parameters '% DNA in the tail' and 'tail moment' for human peripheral lymphocytes did not indicate any difference in the initial radiation damage produced by 29 kV X rays relative to the reference radiations, 220 kV X rays and the gamma rays, whether for the total mean dose range of 0-3 Gy nor in the low-dose range. In contrast, when the 'tail length' data were analysed saturation of the fitted dose response curve appeared for X rays at about 1.5 Gy but was not apparent for gamma rays up to 3 Gy. Preliminary data for alpha exposures of HSC45-M2 cells showed a significant increase in DNA damage only at high doses (>2 Gy Am-241), but the damage at 2 Gy exceeded the damage induced at 2 Gy by Cs-137-gamma-rays by a factor of 2.5. In contrast, other experiments involving different cell systems and DNA damage indicators such as chromosomal aberrations have detected a significant increase in DNA damage at much lower doses, that is at 0.02 Gy for Am-241 and depicte a higher biological effectiveness. These results indicate that differences in biological effects arise through downstream processing of complex DNA damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17182604     DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncl424

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN: 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  5 in total

1.  Oxidative DNA damage in osteoarthritic porcine articular cartilage.

Authors:  Antonia F Chen; Catrin M Davies; Ming De Lin; Beverley Fermor
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 6.384

Review 2.  Chromatin and the Cellular Response to Particle Radiation-Induced Oxidative and Clustered DNA Damage.

Authors:  John M Danforth; Luc Provencher; Aaron A Goodarzi
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-07-13

3.  Differences in Phosphorylated Histone H2AX Foci Formation and Removal of Cells Exposed to Low and High Linear Energy Transfer Radiation.

Authors:  Thomas Ernst Schmid; Olga Zlobinskaya; Gabriele Multhoff
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.236

4.  Are mouse lens epithelial cells more sensitive to γ-irradiation than lymphocytes?

Authors:  Kristina Bannik; Ute Rössler; Theresa Faus-Kessler; Maria Gomolka; Sabine Hornhardt; Claudia Dalke; Olena Klymenko; Michael Rosemann; Klaus-Rüdiger Trott; Michael Atkinson; Ulrike Kulka; Jochen Graw
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  Evaluation of the comet assay for assessing the dose-response relationship of DNA damage induced by ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Chang Xu; Li Qing Du; Jia Cao; Jian Xiang Liu; Xu Su; Hui Zhao; Fei-Yue Fan; Bing Wang; Takanori Katsube; Sai Jun Fan; Qiang Liu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 5.923

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.