Literature DB >> 17182476

Social perception of speech in individuals with oropharyngeal reconstruction.

Jana Rieger1, Nicole Dickson, Roxanne Lemire, Kathleen Bloom, John Wolfaardt, Ulrich Wolfaardt, Hadi Seikaly.   

Abstract

Oral cancer affects approximately 5% of the Canadian population every year. One option for treatment of oropharyngeal cancer includes resection of the diseased tissue with primary reconstruction of the defect using a microvascular free flap, followed by post-operative adjuvant radiation therapy. The aim of reconstructive surgery is to maintain functional speech and swallowing. While the literature provides support for the maintenance of speech intelligibility following reconstructive procedures, certain aspects of resonance may be altered when the palatal structures are involved. Little is known about the effect of such alterations on the perception of speakers who have been treated with microvascular free flap reconstruction. Social perception is a process in which we infer attributes of others, with the speech signal playing an integral part in attribution. The purpose of this study was to explore the social perceptions formed about speakers both before and after surgery for oropharyngeal cancer. The results of this study revealed that positive perceptions of speakers significantly diminished as a result of surgery and negative perceptions increased. Certain variables, such as degree of resection of the soft palate and base of tongue, and sex of the speaker, had influence on the results. This research suggests that intelligibility measurements of speech, although useful, do not provide a complete indication of the social impact of reconstructive surgery on patients with oropharyngeal resections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17182476     DOI: 10.1300/J077v24n04_03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol        ISSN: 0734-7332


  5 in total

Review 1.  Speech and swallowing after surgical treatment of advanced oral and oropharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Anne Marijn Kreeft; Lisette van der Molen; Frans J Hilgers; Alfons J Balm
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  Prosthetic Reconstruction of the Maxilla and Palate.

Authors:  Christopher Pool; Tom Shokri; Aurora Vincent; Weitao Wang; Sameep Kadakia; Yadranko Ducic
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 2.314

3.  Video Game Rehabilitation of Velopharyngeal Dysfunction: A Case Series.

Authors:  Gabriel J Cler; Talia Mittelman; Maia N Braden; Geralyn Harvey Woodnorth; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 4.  Current strategies in reconstruction of maxillectomy defects.

Authors:  Patricio Andrades; Oleg Militsakh; Matthew M Hanasono; Jana Rieger; Eben L Rosenthal
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-08

5.  Transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal cancer: long-term quality of life and functional outcomes.

Authors:  Peter T Dziegielewski; Theodoros N Teknos; Kasim Durmus; Matthew Old; Amit Agrawal; Kiran Kakarala; Anna Marcinow; Enver Ozer
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 6.223

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.