Literature DB >> 17181804

Uncertainty analysis for regional-scale reserve selection.

Atte Moilanen1, Brendan A Wintle, Jane Elith, Mark Burgman.   

Abstract

Methods for reserve selection and conservation planning often ignore uncertainty. For example, presence-absence observations and predictions of habitat models are used as inputs but commonly assumed to be without error. We applied information-gap decision theory to develop uncertainty analysis methods for reserve selection. Our proposed method seeks a solution that is robust in achieving a given conservation target, despite uncertainty in the data. We maximized robustness in reserve selection through a novel method, "distribution discounting," in which the site- and species-specific measure of conservation value (related to species-specific occupancy probabilities) was penalized by an error measure (in our study, related to accuracy of statistical prediction). Because distribution discounting can be implemented as a modification of input files, it is a computationally efficient solution for implementing uncertainty analysis into reserve selection. Thus, the method is particularly useful for high-dimensional decision problems characteristic of regional conservation assessment. We implemented distribution discounting in the zonation reserve-selection algorithm that produces a hierarchy of conservation priorities throughout the landscape. We applied it to reserve selection for seven priority fauna in a landscape in New South Wales, Australia. The distribution discounting method can be easily adapted for use with different kinds of data (e.g., probability of occurrence or abundance) and different landscape descriptions (grid or patch based) and incorporated into other reserve-selection algorithms and software.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17181804     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00560.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  11 in total

1.  Ensemble distribution models in conservation prioritization: from consensus predictions to consensus reserve networks.

Authors:  Laura Meller; Mar Cabeza; Samuel Pironon; Morgane Barbet-Massin; Luigi Maiorano; Damien Georges; Wilfried Thuiller
Journal:  Divers Distrib       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 5.139

2.  Data acquisition for conservation assessments: is the effort worth it?

Authors:  Virgilio Hermoso; Mark J Kennard; Simon Linke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Phylogenetic diversity meets conservation policy: small areas are key to preserving eucalypt lineages.

Authors:  Laura J Pollock; Dan F Rosauer; Andrew H Thornhill; Heini Kujala; Michael D Crisp; Joseph T Miller; Michael A McCarthy
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Considering Future Potential Regarding Structural Diversity in Selection of Forest Reserves.

Authors:  Johanna Lundström; Karin Öhman; Mikael Rönnqvist; Lena Gustafsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Examining current or future trade-offs for biodiversity conservation in north-eastern Australia.

Authors:  April E Reside; Jeremy VanDerWal; Atte Moilanen; Erin M Graham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Spatial conservation prioritisation in data-poor countries: a quantitative sensitivity analysis using multiple taxa.

Authors:  Ahmed El-Gabbas; Francis Gilbert; Carsten F Dormann
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 2.964

7.  Assessing agreement among alternative climate change projections to inform conservation recommendations in the contiguous United States.

Authors:  R Travis Belote; Carlos Carroll; Sebastián Martinuzzi; Julia Michalak; John W Williams; Matthew A Williamson; Gregory H Aplet
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Conservation planning with uncertain climate change projections.

Authors:  Heini Kujala; Atte Moilanen; Miguel B Araújo; Mar Cabeza
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Predicting species distributions for conservation decisions.

Authors:  Antoine Guisan; Reid Tingley; John B Baumgartner; Ilona Naujokaitis-Lewis; Patricia R Sutcliffe; Ayesha I T Tulloch; Tracey J Regan; Lluis Brotons; Eve McDonald-Madden; Chrystal Mantyka-Pringle; Tara G Martin; Jonathan R Rhodes; Ramona Maggini; Samantha A Setterfield; Jane Elith; Mark W Schwartz; Brendan A Wintle; Olivier Broennimann; Mike Austin; Simon Ferrier; Michael R Kearney; Hugh P Possingham; Yvonne M Buckley
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 9.492

10.  Expansion of the agricultural frontier in the largest South American Dry Forest: Identifying priority conservation areas for snakes before everything is lost.

Authors:  María Soledad Andrade-Díaz; Juan Andrés Sarquis; Bette A Loiselle; Alejandro R Giraudo; Juan Manuel Díaz-Gómez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.