Literature DB >> 17180693

[Estimating the prognosis of peripheral facial paralysis: is the minimal nerve excitability test still up to date?].

G Psillas1, J Constantinidis, A Printza, V Vital.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In this retrospective study, we assessed the long-term prognostic value of the minimal nerve excitability test (NET) by comparing the results it yielded with the House-Brackmann (HB) index in patients with the most common types of facial paralysis, Bell's palsy and traumatic facial palsy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred and fifty patients aged 9-85 years (mean age 42.4 years; 156 male and 194 female), all of whom were treated initially with the same steroid therapy, entered on study. Patients in whom decompression surgery had been performed were excluded so as to avoid falsely optimistic prognoses. The 350 study patients were divided into two groups: group 1 was made up of 250 with Bell's palsy and group 2, of 100 with nonpenetrating traumatic facial palsy following temporal bone fracture. The NET was conducted repeatedly in all patients for 3 weeks from the start of day 3 of treatment, the value recorded on day 14 being used in the evaluation. For each patient, the result of the NET was recorded as 'normal', 'diminished' or 'without response' according to the difference between the two sides of the face. The final HB grading was determined after 1 year to check for the agreement between the electrical prognosis and the clinical outcome and thus the reliability of the prognosis indicated by the NET.
RESULTS: The results indicate that a normal NET forecast a satisfactory outcome that could be classed as HB I-II in almost all the patients in both groups. Among patients who had no response on NET, 85% of those with Bell's palsy and 90% of those with traumatic facial palsy failed to recover nerve function. Diminished nerve excitability proved to be a sign of a relatively favourable prognosis: 74% of patients in each group recovered normal facial function.
CONCLUSION: The NET is a method of investigation that is easily applied and can make a positive contribution to the assessment of prognosis in Bell's palsy and in traumatic facial palsy, reflecting the functional state of the facial nerve reliably in most of cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17180693     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-006-1496-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  29 in total

1.  Relation of prognosis of peripheral facial nerve palsy to the period between onset of illness and date of denervation.

Authors:  K Takahashi; A Hara; T Kawase; J Kusakari; T Takasaka
Journal:  Tohoku J Exp Med       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 1.848

2.  Facial paralysis in fractures of the petrous bone.

Authors:  U Fisch
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Reliability of the nerve excitability test in Bell's palsy.

Authors:  P Kraus
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1970-07       Impact factor: 1.469

4.  On the pathogenesis of Bell's palsy.

Authors:  U Fisch; H Felix
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1983 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.494

5.  Clinical factors that influence the prognosis of facial nerve paralysis and the magnitudes of influence.

Authors:  Minoru Ikeda; Yuzuru Abiko; Nobuo Kukimoto; Hideo Omori; Hidehisa Nakazato; Kyoko Ikeda
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Idiopathic facial (Bell's) palsy: a clinical survey of prognostic factors.

Authors:  I M Smith; J P Heath; J A Murray; R E Cull
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  1988-02

7.  Variability of repeated facial nerve electroneurography in healthy subjects.

Authors:  C Sittel; O Guntinas-Lichius; M Streppel; E Stennert
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Surgical and nonsurgical management of facial paralysis following closed head injury.

Authors:  K K Adour; J A Boyajian; Z M Kahn; G S Schneider
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Electrophysiological prognosis in facial paralysis.

Authors:  P Eschapasse; R Dauman; M Cazenave; M Portmann
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  1987-08

10.  Hilger facial nerve stimulator: a 25-year update.

Authors:  B I Lewis; K K Adour; J M Kahn; A J Lewis
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.325

View more
  1 in total

1.  Patient-Assessed Outcomes following Temporal Bone Fractures.

Authors:  Elias Antoniades; George Psillas; Konstantinos Polyzoidis; Ioannis Patsalas
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-21
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.