Literature DB >> 17180291

Laparoscopic Witzel gastrostomy--a reappraised technique.

J-S Hsieh1, C-F Wu, F-M Chen, J-Y Wang, T-J Huang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic gastrostomy is the best alternative for long-term enteral feeding when percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy is not possible. The aim of the present study was to determine the feasibility, complications, adequacy of feeding support, and tolerability of laparoscopic Witzel gastrostomy (LWG) in head and neck cancer patients. The initial results and the results of extended follow-up were evaluated.
METHODS: A consecutive series of 48 patients with stenotic head and neck or esophageal cancer were referred for laparoscopic gastrostomy. The patients consisted of 42 men and 6 women aged 36 to 82 years (mean, 54 years). After laparoscopic placement of a Foley catheter of 16 F into the stomach, a seromuscular tunnel 4 cm in length is created, embedding the catheter by interrupted sutures. Three stay sutures for gastropexy are fixed and tied on the abdominal skin at the end of the procedure. The mean duration of the procedure was 62.4 +/- 11 min (52-124 min).
RESULTS: Laparoscopic Witzel gastrostomy could be performed successfully in all patients with aerodigestive cancer. None of the laparoscopic gastrostomy tube placement procedures was converted to an open surgery, and none of the 48 patients in this series died as a result of the laparoscopic procedure. All LWG complications (11%) were minor, consisting of superficial wound infections, balloon rupture, and chronic granulation. No major complications were encountered. The mean usage time of gastrostomy was 6.3 +/- 5.3 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Current techniques of LWG could be an alternative to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) for long-term enteral access, because it has proved to be safe and reproducible with relatively few complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17180291     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-006-9018-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   3.453


  22 in total

1.  Home enteral nutrition via gastrostomy in advanced head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  A C Campos; M Butters; M M Meguid
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  1990 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.147

2.  The use of gastrostomy to correct malnutrition.

Authors:  M M Meguid; L F Williams
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1979-07

3.  Tube gastrostomy. Techniques and complications.

Authors:  P C Shellito; R A Malt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Laparoscopic continent gastrostomy.

Authors:  J P Arnaud; C Casa; A Manunta
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Laparoscopic gastrostomy using T-fasteners as retractors and anchors.

Authors:  Q Y Duh; L W Way
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy at the time of tumour resection in advanced oral cancer.

Authors:  D R Cunliffe; C Swanton; C White; S R Watt-Smith; T A Cook; B D George
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.337

Review 7.  Current management of cancer-associated anorexia and weight loss.

Authors:  A Jatoi; C L Loprinzi
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.990

8.  Laparoscopic gastrostomy and jejunostomy are safe and effective for obtaining enteral access.

Authors:  K M Murayama; T J Johnson; J S Thompson
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Indications, success, complications, and mortality in 314 consecutive patients.

Authors:  D E Larson; D D Burton; K W Schroeder; E P DiMagno
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  The Stamm gastrostomy: a sound procedure.

Authors:  F C Au
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 0.688

View more
  3 in total

1.  Percutaneous radiological gastrostomy in esophageal cancer patients: a feasible and safe access for nutritional support during multimodal therapy.

Authors:  Williams Tessier; Guillaume Piessen; Nicolas Briez; Arianna Boschetto; Géraldine Sergent; Christophe Mariette
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  A simple and safe minimally invasive technique for laparoscopic gastrostomy.

Authors:  Emad Kandil; Haytham Alabbas; Christian Jacob; Paul Friedlander; Juan Duchesne; Virendra Joshi; Charles Bellows
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2010 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

3.  Comparison of laparoscopic versus open approach to gastrostomy tubes.

Authors:  Ido Mizrahi; Malika Garg; Celia M Divino; Scott Nguyen
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2014 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.