BACKGROUND: Most laparoscopic bariatric programs are situated in a community- or university-based hospital. The authors have recently initiated a program at a safety net hospital. This investigation hypothesizes that a laparoscopic bariatric program can be established at a safety net hospital with good clinical and financial results. METHODS: A laparoscopic bariatric program was initiated December 2002 at a safety net hospital. The program included a dedicated operative suite, an operative team, a bariatric unit, and a clinical pathway. The data for all the patients who underwent laparoscopic gastric bypasses up to June 2003 were analyzed. The patients were analyzed by type of insurance: government-sponsored insurance (G) or commercial insurance (C). RESULTS: There were 104 patients during this period. Their mean age was 40 years (range, 18-63 years), and their mean body mass index was 48 (range, 38-62). The median length of hospital stay was 2 days (mean, 3.9 days). Hypertension and diabetes were resolved for more than 80% of the patients. The average percentage of excess body weight loss was 73% after 1 year. There were no significant clinical differences between payor groups. The payor mix was 31% G and 69% C. The mean collection rates for hospital charges were 10% for G versus 53% for C (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: A laparoscopic bariatric program can be established in a safety net hospital with good clinical results. Findings showed that 1-year weight loss and comorbidity improvement/resolution compares favorably with those of other programs. Despite the overall poor payor mix of many safety net hospitals, a bariatric program can be established and can attract a high rate of commercially insured patients.
BACKGROUND: Most laparoscopic bariatric programs are situated in a community- or university-based hospital. The authors have recently initiated a program at a safety net hospital. This investigation hypothesizes that a laparoscopic bariatric program can be established at a safety net hospital with good clinical and financial results. METHODS: A laparoscopic bariatric program was initiated December 2002 at a safety net hospital. The program included a dedicated operative suite, an operative team, a bariatric unit, and a clinical pathway. The data for all the patients who underwent laparoscopic gastric bypasses up to June 2003 were analyzed. The patients were analyzed by type of insurance: government-sponsored insurance (G) or commercial insurance (C). RESULTS: There were 104 patients during this period. Their mean age was 40 years (range, 18-63 years), and their mean body mass index was 48 (range, 38-62). The median length of hospital stay was 2 days (mean, 3.9 days). Hypertension and diabetes were resolved for more than 80% of the patients. The average percentage of excess body weight loss was 73% after 1 year. There were no significant clinical differences between payor groups. The payor mix was 31% G and 69% C. The mean collection rates for hospital charges were 10% for G versus 53% for C (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: A laparoscopic bariatric program can be established in a safety net hospital with good clinical results. Findings showed that 1-year weight loss and comorbidity improvement/resolution compares favorably with those of other programs. Despite the overall poor payor mix of many safety net hospitals, a bariatric program can be established and can attract a high rate of commercially insured patients.
Authors: Craig See; Preston L Carter; David Elliott; Philip Mullenix; William Eggebroten; Clifford Porter; David Watts Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Lars Sjöström; Anna-Karin Lindroos; Markku Peltonen; Jarl Torgerson; Claude Bouchard; Björn Carlsson; Sven Dahlgren; Bo Larsson; Kristina Narbro; Carl David Sjöström; Marianne Sullivan; Hans Wedel Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-12-23 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Alexandra Dresel; Joseph A Kuhn; Matthew V Westmoreland; Loraye J Talaasen; Todd M McCarty Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: P K Papasavas; F D Hayetian; P F Caushaj; R J Landreneau; J Maurer; R J Keenan; R F Quinlin; D J Gagné Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2002-09-23 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Ronald Clements; Alan Saber; Julio Teixeira; David Provost; Robert Fanelli; William Richardson Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2010-11-03 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Atul K Madan; John D Whitfield; John N Fain; Bettina M Beech; Craig A Ternovits; Suraj Menachery; David S Tichansky Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Elsbeth Jensen-Otsu; Emily K Ward; Breana Mitchell; Jonathan A Schoen; Kevin Rothchild; Nia S Mitchell; Gregory L Austin Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Tayler J James; Stephen F Sener; James D Nguyen; Marc Rothschild; Lauren Hawley; Tanu A Patel; Rachel Sargent; Adrian Dobrowolsky Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2021-07-02 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: D Wayne Overby; Geoffrey P Kohn; Karen J Colton; Joseph M Stavas; Robert G Dixon; Anthony Passannante; Timothy M Farrell Journal: ISRN Surg Date: 2012-07-08