OBJECTIVE: Although central tears of the triangular fibrocartilage are easily seen on imaging, peripheral tears of the ulnar attachment are frequently missed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of MR arthrography of the distal radioulnar joint in depiction of peripheral tears of the triangular fibrocartilage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients (18 women, 23 men; mean age, 38 years; age range, 18-60 years) underwent MR arthrography and wrist arthroscopy. For MR arthrography, iopamidol (300 mg I/mL) and gadopentetate dimeglumine (4 mmol/L) were injected into the distal radioulnar joint. Consensus review of both MR arthrograms and conventional arthrograms was performed by two experienced musculoskeletal radiologists. Presence or absence of communicating and noncommunicating tears of the ulnar attachment of the triangular fibrocartilage was recorded. Arthroscopy was used as the standard of reference for determining sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in detection of tears of the ulnar attachment. RESULTS: At MR arthrography, communicating tear of the ulnar attachment was diagnosed in three patients, noncommunicating tear in 19 patients, and normal attachment in 19 patients. Arthroscopy revealed peripheral tear of the triangular fibrocartilage in all three patients with communicating tear, in 14 of 19 patients with noncommunicating tear, and in three of 19 patients with normal attachment. The sensitivity was 85% (17/20), specificity was 76% (16/21), and accuracy was 80% (33/41). CONCLUSION: MR arthrography of the distal radioulnar joint is accurate in depiction of peripheral tears of the ulnar attachment of the triangular fibrocartilage. These tears often appear as noncommunicating tears extending from the distal radioulnar joint into the triangular fibrocartilage.
OBJECTIVE: Although central tears of the triangular fibrocartilage are easily seen on imaging, peripheral tears of the ulnar attachment are frequently missed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of MR arthrography of the distal radioulnar joint in depiction of peripheral tears of the triangular fibrocartilage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients (18 women, 23 men; mean age, 38 years; age range, 18-60 years) underwent MR arthrography and wrist arthroscopy. For MR arthrography, iopamidol (300 mg I/mL) and gadopentetate dimeglumine (4 mmol/L) were injected into the distal radioulnar joint. Consensus review of both MR arthrograms and conventional arthrograms was performed by two experienced musculoskeletal radiologists. Presence or absence of communicating and noncommunicating tears of the ulnar attachment of the triangular fibrocartilage was recorded. Arthroscopy was used as the standard of reference for determining sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in detection of tears of the ulnar attachment. RESULTS: At MR arthrography, communicating tear of the ulnar attachment was diagnosed in three patients, noncommunicating tear in 19 patients, and normal attachment in 19 patients. Arthroscopy revealed peripheral tear of the triangular fibrocartilage in all three patients with communicating tear, in 14 of 19 patients with noncommunicating tear, and in three of 19 patients with normal attachment. The sensitivity was 85% (17/20), specificity was 76% (16/21), and accuracy was 80% (33/41). CONCLUSION: MR arthrography of the distal radioulnar joint is accurate in depiction of peripheral tears of the ulnar attachment of the triangular fibrocartilage. These tears often appear as noncommunicating tears extending from the distal radioulnar joint into the triangular fibrocartilage.
Authors: Ryan K L Lee; Alex W H Ng; Cina S L Tong; James F Griffith; W L Tse; C Wong; P C Ho Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2013-06-28 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Ji Hun Park; Kyung-Sik Ahn; Anseong Chang; Young Woo Kwon; In Cheul Choi; Jong Woong Park Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2019-07-18 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Alberto Bellelli; Enzo Silvestri; Antonio Barile; Domenico Albano; Alberto Aliprandi; Roberto Caudana; Vito Chianca; Francesco Di Pietto; Carlo Faletti; Eugenio Genovese; Andrea Giovagnoni; Carlo Masciocchi; Carmelo Messina; Luca Maria Sconfienza; Vincenzo Spina; Marcello Zappia Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2019-01-28 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Zeev V Maizlin; Jacqueline A Brown; Jason J Clement; Julia Grebenyuk; David M Fenton; Donna E Smith; Jon A Jacobson Journal: Hand (N Y) Date: 2008-12-02