Literature DB >> 17179252

A randomized prospective study comparing the Cobra Perilaryngeal Airway and Laryngeal Mask Airway-Classic during controlled ventilation for gynecological laparoscopy.

Eilish M Galvin1, Mirjam van Doorn, Juan Blazquez, Johannes F Ubben, Freek J Zijlstra, Jan Klein, Serge J C Verbrugge.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An increasing number of noninvasive, supraglottic airway devices are currently available. In this randomized single-blind study, we compared the Cobra Perilaryngeal Airway (CobraPLA) to the [Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA)-Classic] during gynecological laparoscopy.
METHODS: Forty patients received either an LMA-Classic or a CobraPLA. Insertion, ventilation and removal characteristics were noted, as well as any throat morbidity.
RESULTS: Devices were similar for insertion characteristics, adverse events, and throat morbidity. Before pneumoperitoneum, peak airway pressures were 20.3 +/- 4.9 cm H2O in the LMA-Classic group versus 25.5 +/- 7.9 cm H2O in the CobraPLA group, P = 0.01. This difference was maintained during pneumoperitoneum; LMA-Classic (22.8 +/- 6.1 cm H2O) and CobraPLA (28.1 +/- 8.5 cm H2O), P = 0.04. Macroscopic blood occurred only on the CobraPLA, seen on 40% of the devices after removal, P = 0.001.
CONCLUSION: During gynecological laparoscopy, the CobraPLA provides similar insertion characteristics, but higher airway sealing pressures than the LMA-Classic. The usefulness of this finding requires further investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17179252     DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000246812.21391.d1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  9 in total

1.  Cobra perilaryngeal airway for thyroid surgery in a hypertensive patient.

Authors:  Rakesh Garg; Sanjay Verma
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Comparison of volume-controlled and pressure-controlled ventilation using a laryngeal mask airway during gynecological laparoscopy.

Authors:  Woo Jae Jeon; Sang Yun Cho; Mi Rang Bang; So-Young Ko
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2011-03-30

3.  The effect of cuff pressure on postoperative sore throat after Cobra perilaryngeal airway.

Authors:  Han Bum Joe; Dae Hee Kim; Yun Jeong Chae; Jong Yeop Kim; Min Kang; Kwan Sik Park
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  Comparison of the air-Q intubating laryngeal airway and the cobra perilaryngeal airway as conduits for fiber optic-guided intubation in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Karim K Girgis; Maha M I Youssef; Nashwa S ElZayyat
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2014-10

5.  The role of ventilation mode using a laryngeal mask airway during gynecological laparoscopy on lung mechanics, hemodynamic response and blood gas analysis.

Authors:  Mohammad Hossein Jarahzadeh; Iman Halvaei; Farshid Rahimi-Bashar; Shekoufeh Behdad; Rouhollah Abbasizadeh Nasrabady; Elahe Yasaei
Journal:  Int J Reprod Biomed (Yazd)       Date:  2016-12

6.  Cobra-PLA provides higher oropharyngeal leak pressure than LMA-Classic and LMA-Unique: A meta-analysis with 22 studies.

Authors:  Yuan Tan; Guangyou Duan; Qin Chen; Feng Chen; Hong Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Randomized Comparison of Actual and Ideal Body Weight for Size Selection of the Laryngeal Mask Airway Classic in Overweight Patients.

Authors:  Min-Soo Kim; Jong Seok Lee; Sang Beom Nam; Hyo Jong Kang; Ji Eun Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 2.153

8.  Efficacy of the New Perilaryngeal Airway (CobraPLA™) Versus the Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA™) to Improve Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure in Obese and Overweight Patients.

Authors:  Siamak Yaghoobi; Seyed Mohamadreza Abootorabi; Hamid Kayalha; Tom C Van Zundert; Amir H Pakpour
Journal:  Tanaffos       Date:  2015

9.  Extraglottic airway devices: A review.

Authors:  Ramesh Ramaiah; Debasmita Das; Sanjay M Bhananker; Aaron M Joffe
Journal:  Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci       Date:  2014-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.