Literature DB >> 17178813

Validation of commercial DNA tests for quantitative beef quality traits.

A L Van Eenennaam1, J Li, R M Thallman, R L Quaas, M E Dikeman, C A Gill, D E Franke, M G Thomas.   

Abstract

Associations between 3 commercially available genetic marker panels (GeneSTAR Quality Grade, GeneSTAR Tenderness, and Igenity Tender-GENE) and quantitative beef traits were validated by the US National Beef Cattle Evaluation Consortium. Validation was interpreted to be the independent confirmation of the associations between genetic tests and phenotypes, as claimed by the commercial genotyping companies. Validation of the quality grade test (GeneSTAR Quality Grade) was carried out on 400 Charolais x Angus crossbred cattle, and validation of the tenderness tests (GeneSTAR Tenderness and Igenity Tender-GENE) was carried out on over 1,000 Bos taurus and Bos indicus cattle. The GeneSTAR Quality Grade marker panel is composed of 2 markers (TG5, a SNP upstream from the start of the first exon of thyroglobulin, and QG2, an anonymous SNP) and is being marketed as a test associated with marbling and quality grade. In this validation study, the genotype results from this test were not associated with marbling score; however, the association of substituting favorable alleles of the marker panel with increased quality grade (percentage of cattle grading Choice or Prime) approached significance (P < or = 0.06), mainly due to the effect of 1 of the 2 markers. The GeneSTAR Tenderness and Igenity TenderGENE marker panels are being marketed as tests associated with meat tenderness, as assessed by Warner-Bratzler shear force. These marker panels share 2 common mu-calpain SNP, but each has a different calpastatin SNP. In both panels, there were highly significant (P < 0.001) associations of the calpastatin marker and the mu-calpain haplotype with tenderness. The genotypic effects of the 2 tenderness panels were similar to each other, with a 1 kg difference in Warner-Bratzler shear force being observed between the most and least tender genotypes. Unbiased and independent validation studies are important to help build confidence in marker technology and also as a potential source of data required to enable the integration of marker data into genetic evaluations. As DNA tests associated with more beef production traits enter the marketplace, it will become increasingly important, and likely more difficult, to find independent populations with suitable phenotypes for validation studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17178813     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2006-512

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  24 in total

1.  CAPN1 markers in three Argentinean cattle breeds: report of a new InDel polymorphism within intron 17.

Authors:  P P Iglesias; M E Caffaro; A F Amadio; A Arias Mañotti; M A Poli
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 2.316

2.  Comparison of skeletal muscle transcriptional profiles in dairy and beef breeds bulls.

Authors:  T Sadkowski; M Jank; L Zwierzchowski; J Oprzadek; T Motyl
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Genetic variability and linkage disequilibrium patterns in the bovine DNAJA1 gene.

Authors:  Amandine Marty; Yves Amigues; Bertrand Servin; Gilles Renand; Hubert Levéziel; Dominique Rocha
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.695

4.  Haplotypic diversity within the ovine calpastatin (CAST) gene.

Authors:  S O Byun; H Zhou; J G H Hickford
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2008-09-20       Impact factor: 2.695

5.  Development and validation of a small SNP panel for feed efficiency in beef cattle.

Authors:  M K Abo-Ismail; N Lansink; E Akanno; B K Karisa; J J Crowley; S S Moore; E Bork; P Stothard; J A Basarab; G S Plastow
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Effects of genetic variants for the bovine calpain gene on meat tenderness.

Authors:  Hoyoung Chung; Sungchul Shin; Euiryong Chung
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 2.316

7.  Epistasis between calpain 1 and its inhibitor calpastatin within breeds of cattle.

Authors:  W Barendse; B E Harrison; R J Hawken; D M Ferguson; J M Thompson; M B Thomas; R J Bunch
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-07-01       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Genome-wide association analysis for quantitative trait loci influencing Warner-Bratzler shear force in five taurine cattle breeds.

Authors:  M C McClure; H R Ramey; M M Rolf; S D McKay; J E Decker; R H Chapple; J W Kim; T M Taxis; R L Weaber; R D Schnabel; J F Taylor
Journal:  Anim Genet       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Polymorphisms in bovine immune genes and their associations with somatic cell count and milk production in dairy cattle.

Authors:  Christine Beecher; Mairead Daly; Stuart Childs; Donagh P Berry; David A Magee; Tommie V McCarthy; Linda Giblin
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 2.797

10.  Association of selected SNP with carcass and taste panel assessed meat quality traits in a commercial population of Aberdeen Angus-sired beef cattle.

Authors:  Jennifer L Gill; Stephen C Bishop; Caroline McCorquodale; John L Williams; Pamela Wiener
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 4.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.