Literature DB >> 17178745

Psychological distress by type of fertility barrier.

Mary Casey Jacob1, J McQuillan, A L Greil.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We examined fertility-specific distress (FSD) and general distress by type of fertility barrier (FB).
METHODS: In a random sample telephone survey, 580 US women reported their fertility intentions and histories. Six groups of women were identified: (i) no FBs, (ii) infertile with intent, (iii) infertile without intent, (iv) other fertility problems, (v) miscarriages and (vi) situational barriers. Multiple regression analyses were used to compare groups with FBs.
RESULTS: Sixty-one percent reported FBs and 28% reported an inability to conceive for at least 12 months. The infertile with intent group had the highest FSD, which was largely explained by (a) self-identification as infertile and (b) seeking medical help for fertility. The no FB group had a mean Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale score above the commonly used cut-off of 16, although 23% of the women with FBs did score above 16.
CONCLUSIONS: FBs are common. Self-identification as infertile is the largest source of FSD. More women with FBs had elevated general distress than women without FBs; mean general distress was below 16 for all FB groups. It may be that, for some women (even those with children), FBs can have lasting emotional consequences, but many women do heal from the emotional distress that may accompany fertility difficulties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17178745     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/del452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  14 in total

1.  Responding to Infertility: Lessons From a Growing Body of Research and Suggested Guidelines for Practice.

Authors:  Karina M Shreffler; Arthur L Greil; Julia McQuillan
Journal:  Fam Relat       Date:  2017-10

2.  Infertility treatment and fertility-specific distress: A longitudinal analysis of a population-based sample of U.S. women.

Authors:  Arthur L Greil; Julia McQuillan; Michele Lowry; Karina M Shreffler
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Specifying the effects of religion on medical helpseeking: the case of infertility.

Authors:  Arthur Greil; Julia McQuillan; Maureen Benjamins; David R Johnson; Katherine M Johnson; Chelsea R Heinz
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Variation in distress among women with infertility: evidence from a population-based sample.

Authors:  Arthur L Greil; Karina M Shreffler; Lone Schmidt; Julia McQuillan
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 5.  The experience of infertility: a review of recent literature.

Authors:  Arthur L Greil; Kathleen Slauson-Blevins; Julia McQuillan
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2009-12-09

Review 6.  Stress and reproductive failure: past notions, present insights and future directions.

Authors:  Katrina Nakamura; Sam Sheps; Petra Clara Arck
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Is infertility resolution associated with a change in women's well-being?

Authors:  Karina M Shreffler; Arthur L Greil; Stacy M Tiemeyer; Julia McQuillan
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Psychological coping strategies associated with improved mental health in the context of infertility.

Authors:  Andie Chernoff; Ashley A Balsom; Jennifer L Gordon
Journal:  Arch Womens Ment Health       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 3.633

9.  Does fertility-specific distress vary by race/ethnicity among a probability sample of women in the United States?

Authors:  Arthur L Greil; Julia McQuillan; Delida Sanchez
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2014-03-24

10.  "Trying" times: Medicalization, intent, and ambiguity in the definition of infertility.

Authors:  Arthur L Greil; Julia McQuillan
Journal:  Med Anthropol Q       Date:  2010-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.