Literature DB >> 17178314

Designing a sustainable national registry for stroke quality improvement.

Lee Schwamm1, Mathew J Reeves, Michael Frankel.   

Abstract

Several studies have shown wide variations in the delivery of hospital-based care to patients with acute ischemic stroke. The findings of these studies suggest that recommendations drawn from published evidence-based or consensus-based guidelines are implemented inconsistently. Although rates of adherence to stroke quality indicators can be increased through the use of targeted quality improvement (QI) efforts, stroke QI programs are still in their infancy. Current stroke QI programs are often highly variable and poorly coordinated, rely on differing definitions of key data elements and/or indicators, and are challenging to implement and sustain in resource-constrained healthcare environments. Key barriers to long-term success of these programs include inadequate funding at the local and national level, lack of infrastructure to support electronic data capture for QI as part of the process of patient care, lack of a single clearinghouse for uniform data definitions and performance indicator descriptions, competing survey instruments to monitor hospitalized stroke care, and constraints on inpatient and post-discharge data collection imposed by the new Federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act Privacy Rule. In addition, the competing needs of registry activities (e.g., complete case ascertainment) versus QI efforts (e.g., incremental tests of change) must be balanced. Potential solutions include: (1) financial incentives to healthcare providers and institutions for participation in QI initiatives; (2) financial incentives to healthcare providers and institutions for measurable improvements in care; (3) mandatory data reporting on key measures of stroke care; and (4) promotion of active and sustainable collaborations among key stakeholders including healthcare providers (e.g., physicians, nurses), healthcare organizations (e.g., hospitals, physicians' groups), quality improvement organizations, health payers and insurers, public health departments, and state and federal health agencies to create a single national stroke registry for stroke QI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17178314     DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.08.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  10 in total

1.  The Lombardia Stroke Unit Registry: 1-year experience of a web-based hospital stroke registry.

Authors:  Giuseppe Micieli; Anna Cavallini; Silvana Quaglini; Giancarlo Fontana; Michela Duè
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 3.307

2.  Barriers and facilitators for the implementation of health condition and outcome registry systems: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Mina Lazem; Abbas Sheikhtaheri
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Meeting the ambition of measuring the quality of hospitals' stroke care using routinely collected administrative data: a feasibility study.

Authors:  William L Palmer; Alex Bottle; Charlie Davie; Charles A Vincent; Paul Aylin
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 2.038

4.  Design and implementation of the first nationwide, web-based Chinese Renal Data System (CNRDS).

Authors:  Fengbo Xie; Dong Zhang; Jinzhao Wu; Yunfeng Zhang; Qing Yang; Xuefeng Sun; Jing Cheng; Xiangmei Chen
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 2.796

5.  Facilitators and barriers to applying a national quality registry for quality improvement in stroke care.

Authors:  Ann Catrine Eldh; Mio Fredriksson; Christina Halford; Lars Wallin; Tobias Dahlström; Sofie Vengberg; Ulrika Winblad
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Factors facilitating a national quality registry to aid clinical quality improvement: findings of a national survey.

Authors:  Ann Catrine Eldh; Lars Wallin; Mio Fredriksson; Sofie Vengberg; Ulrika Winblad; Christina Halford; Tobias Dahlström
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 7.  The American Heart Association's Get With the Guidelines (GWTG)-Stroke development and impact on stroke care.

Authors:  Cora H Ormseth; Kevin N Sheth; Jeffrey L Saver; Gregg C Fonarow; Lee H Schwamm
Journal:  Stroke Vasc Neurol       Date:  2017-05-29

8.  Regional differences in the care and outcomes of acute stroke patients in Australia: an observational study using evidence from the Australian Stroke Clinical Registry (AuSCR).

Authors:  Mitchell Dwyer; Karen Francis; Gregory M Peterson; Karen Ford; Seana Gall; Hoang Phan; Helen Castley; Lillian Wong; Richard White; Fiona Ryan; Lauren Arthurson; Joosup Kim; Dominique A Cadilhac; Natasha A Lannin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Inter-rater reliability of data elements from a prototype of the Paul Coverdell National Acute Stroke Registry.

Authors:  Mathew J Reeves; Andrew J Mullard; Susan Wehner
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 2.474

10.  Depicting the interplay between organisational tiers in the use of a national quality registry to develop quality of care in Sweden.

Authors:  Ann Catrine Eldh; Mio Fredriksson; Sofie Vengberg; Christina Halford; Lars Wallin; Tobias Dahlström; Ulrika Winblad
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.655

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.