Literature DB >> 17178265

Effect of CYP3A5*3 genotype on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of amlodipine in healthy Korean subjects.

Kyoung-Ah Kim1, Pil-Whan Park, Ock-Je Lee, Sang-Hyun Choi, Bon Hong Min, Kyung-Ho Shin, Boe-Gwun Chun, Jae-Gook Shin, Ji-Young Park.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: 1,4-Dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, including amlodipine, are mainly metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A. We investigated the effect of CYP3A5*3 genotype on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of amlodipine in healthy Korean male subjects.
METHODS: Forty healthy male participants were enrolled and genotyped for the CYP3A5*3 gene. Each subject ingested a 5-mg dose of amlodipine, and plasma amlodipine concentrations were measured for 144 hours after dosing. Blood pressure and pulse rate were also measured for pharmacodynamic analysis.
RESULTS: Among the 40 volunteers, 24 were CYP3A5*3/*3 carriers and 16 were CYP3A5*1 carriers (CYP3A5*1/*1 in 2 and CYP3A5*1/*3 in 14). The difference in the oral clearance of amlodipine approached statistical significance between the 2 major genotype groups, with CYP3A5*1 carriers (27.0 +/- 8.2 L/h) showing 20% lower clearance than CYP3A5*3/*3 carriers (32.4 +/- 10.2 L/h) (P = .063). However, the mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve of amlodipine was 200.9 +/- 61.9 ng . h/mL for CYP3A5*1 carriers and 167.6 +/- 45.0 ng . h/mL for CYP3A5*3/*3 carriers (P = .029). Moreover, the peak plasma concentration was significantly higher in CYP3A5*1 carriers (3.8 +/- 1.1 ng/mL) than in CYP3A5*3/*3 carriers (3.1 +/- 0.8 ng/mL) (P = .037). Pharmacodynamically, blood pressure and pulse rate were not significantly different between the 2 groups.
CONCLUSIONS: CYP3A5*3/*3 carriers exhibited lower plasma amlodipine concentrations than CYP3A5*1 carriers. These findings suggest that the polymorphic CYP3A5 gene affects the disposition of amlodipine and provides a plausible explanation for interindividual variability in amlodipine disposition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17178265     DOI: 10.1016/j.clpt.2006.09.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0009-9236            Impact factor:   6.875


  19 in total

1.  Effects of CYP3A5, MDR1 and CACNA1C polymorphisms on the oral disposition and response of nimodipine in a Chinese cohort.

Authors:  Ying Zhao; Desheng Zhai; Hui He; Tingting Li; Xijing Chen; Hui Ji
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  The influence of comedication on tacrolimus blood concentration in patients subjected to kidney transplantation: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Neven Vavic; Nemanja Rancic; Viktorija Dragojevic-Simic; Biljana Draskovic-Pavlovic; Dubravko Bokonjic; Ljiljana Ignjatovic; Momir Mikov
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 2.441

3.  CYP3A5*3 and MDR1 C3435T are influencing factors of inter-subject variability in rupatadine pharmacokinetics in healthy Chinese volunteers.

Authors:  Yuqing Xiong; Zhao Yuan; Jingzhi Yang; Chunhua Xia; Xinhua Li; Shibo Huang; Hong Zhang; Mingyi Liu
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 2.441

4.  Effect of the P450 oxidoreductase 28 polymorphism on the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in Chinese healthy male volunteers.

Authors:  Jing-Jing Zhang; Hua Zhang; Xiao-Liang Ding; Sheng Ma; Li-Yan Miao
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 polymorphisms and blood pressure response to amlodipine among African-American men and women with early hypertensive renal disease.

Authors:  Vibha Bhatnagar; Erin P Garcia; Daniel T O'Connor; Victoria H Brophy; John Alcaraz; Erin Richard; George L Bakris; John P Middleton; Keith C Norris; Jackson Wright; Leena Hiremath; Gabriel Contreras; Lawrence J Appel; Michael S Lipkowitz
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 3.754

Review 6.  CYP3A5 polymorphism, amlodipine and hypertension.

Authors:  Y-P Zhang; X-C Zuo; Z-J Huang; J-J Cai; J Wen; D D Duan; H Yuan
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 3.012

7.  Quantitative model for the blood pressure-lowering interaction of valsartan and amlodipine.

Authors:  Young-A Heo; Nick Holford; Yukyung Kim; Mijeong Son; Kyungsoo Park
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 4.335

8.  Bioequivalence evaluation of two amlodipine salts, besylate and orotate, each in a fixed-dose combination with olmesartan in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Soo-Yun Lee; Jung-Ryul Kim; Jin Ah Jung; Wooseong Huh; Mi Young Bahng; Jae-Wook Ko
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 4.162

9.  Top Three Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine Applications at the Nexus of Renal Pathophysiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

Authors:  Murielle Bochud; Michel Burnier; Idris Guessous
Journal:  Curr Pharmacogenomics Person Med       Date:  2011-12

10.  Effect of CYP3A5*3 genotype on the pharmacokinetics and antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Kyoung-Ah Kim; Pil-Whan Park; Ji-Young Park
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.