Literature DB >> 17178240

Cholinergic modulation of Pavlovian fear conditioning in rats: differential effects of intrahippocampal infusion of mecamylamine and methyllycaconitine.

David R Vago1, Raymond P Kesner.   

Abstract

The cholinergic system has consistently been implicated in Pavlovian fear conditioning. Considerable work has been done to localize specific nicotinic receptor subtypes in the hippocampus and determine their functional importance; however, the specific function of many of these subtypes has yet to be determined. An alpha7 nicotinic antagonist methyllycaconitine (MLA) (35 microg), and a broad spectrum non-alpha7 nicotinic antagonist mecamylamine (35 microg) was injected directly into the dorsal hippocampus or overlying cortex either 15 min pre-, 1 min post-, or 6h post-fear conditioning. One week after conditioning, retention of contextual and cue (tone) conditioning were assessed. A significant impairment in retention of contextual fear was observed when mecamylamine was injected 15 min pre- and 1 min post-conditioning. No significant impairment was observed when mecamylamine was injected 6h post-conditioning. Likewise, a significant impairment in retention of contextual fear was observed when MLA was injected 1 min post-conditioning; however, in contrast, MLA did not show any significant impairments when injected 15 min pre-conditioning, but did show a significant impairment when injected 6h post-conditioning. There were no significant impairments observed when either drug was injected into overlying cortex. No significant impairments were observed in cue conditioning for either drug. In general, specific temporal dynamics involved in nicotinic receptor function were found relative to time of receptor dysfunction. The results indicate that the greatest deficits in long-term retention (1 week) of contextual fear are produced by central infusion of MLA minutes to hours post-conditioning or mecamylamine within minutes of conditioning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17178240      PMCID: PMC1951534          DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2006.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem        ISSN: 1074-7427            Impact factor:   2.877


  52 in total

1.  Acquisition deficit and time-dependent retrograde amnesia for contextual fear conditioning in agmatine-treated rats.

Authors:  L S Stewart; B E McKay
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.293

Review 2.  Neurobiology of Pavlovian fear conditioning.

Authors:  S Maren
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 12.449

3.  Differential contribution of amygdala and hippocampus to cued and contextual fear conditioning.

Authors:  R G Phillips; J E LeDoux
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 1.912

4.  Electrolytic lesions of the fimbria/fornix, dorsal hippocampus, or entorhinal cortex produce anterograde deficits in contextual fear conditioning in rats.

Authors:  S Maren; M S Fanselow
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.877

5.  Functional transitions between epileptiform-like activity and associative memory in hippocampal region CA3.

Authors:  G V Wallenstein; M E Hasselmo
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.077

6.  Facilitation of simultaneous visual discrimination by nicotine in the rat.

Authors:  F Bovet-Nitti
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1966

7.  Characterisation of the binding of [3H]methyllycaconitine: a new radioligand for labelling alpha 7-type neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.

Authors:  A R Davies; D J Hardick; I S Blagbrough; B V Potter; A J Wolstenholme; S Wonnacott
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.250

8.  Temporally graded retrograde amnesia of contextual fear after hippocampal damage in rats: within-subjects examination.

Authors:  S G Anagnostaras; S Maren; M S Fanselow
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Naloxone and shock-elicited freezing in the rat.

Authors:  M S Fanselow; R C Bolles
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1979-08

10.  Effects of central nicotinic cholinergic receptor blockade produced by chlorisondamine on learning and memory performance in rats.

Authors:  M W Decker; M J Majchrzak
Journal:  Behav Neural Biol       Date:  1993-09
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Cholinergic regulation of fear learning and extinction.

Authors:  Marlene A Wilson; Jim R Fadel
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 4.164

2.  Amyloid beta mediates memory formation.

Authors:  Ana Garcia-Osta; Cristina M Alberini
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 3.  Cellular, molecular, and genetic substrates underlying the impact of nicotine on learning.

Authors:  Thomas J Gould; Prescott T Leach
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 2.877

4.  Nicotinic modulation of descending pain control circuitry.

Authors:  Iboro C Umana; Claire A Daniele; Brooke A Miller; Chandrika Abburi; Keith Gallagher; Meghan A Brown; Peggy Mason; Daniel S McGehee
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 7.926

5.  Alpha7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Play a Predominant Role in the Cholinergic Potentiation of N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Evoked Firing Responses of Hippocampal CA1 Pyramidal Cells.

Authors:  Zsolt K Bali; Lili V Nagy; István Hernádi
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 5.505

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.