Literature DB >> 17176574

Siberian subtype tickborne encephalitis virus, Finland.

Anu E Jääskeläinen1, Tapani Tikkakoski, Nathalie Y Uzcátegui, Andrey N Alekseev, Antti Vaheri, Olli Vapalahti.   

Abstract

We isolated 11 Siberian subtype tickborne encephalitis virus (TBEV) strains from Ixodes persulcatus ticks from a TBEV-endemic focus in the Kokkola Archipelago, western Finland. Thus I. persulcatus and the Siberian TBEV are reported in a focus considerably northwest of their previously known range in eastern Europe and Siberia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17176574      PMCID: PMC3290944          DOI: 10.3201/eid1210.060320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis        ISSN: 1080-6040            Impact factor:   6.883


Tickborne encephalitis (TBE) is a disease endemic in a zone extending from central and eastern Europe to Siberia and Japan. Three subtypes of the causative agent tickborne encephalitis virus (TBEV) are known: the European, Siberian, and Far Eastern (,). The main vector for the European subtype is Ixodes ricinus, and for the other 2 subtypes, I. persulcatus (,–). I. ricinus is found in Europe and Middle East (), and I. persulcatus ranges from eastern Europe to China and Japan. The boundary between their distribution lies at the Russian side of the Finnish-Russian border (,). The distribution areas of both tick species overlap in eastern Europe (,) (Figure 1). I. persulcatus has not been reported from northern or western Europe except for an engorged nymph on a willow warbler (Phylloscopus trochilus) in northeastern Sweden in May 1992 ().
Figure 1

The known distribution of tickborne encephalitis (TBE)–virus endemic areas and Ixodes ticks in northern Europe. Yellow: TBE-endemic areas, adapted from International Scientific Working Group on Tick-Borne Encephalitis (). To the south and west from the solid line, Ixodes ricinus distribution; to the east from the dashed line, I. persulcatus distribution; Lpr, Lappeenranta; EST, Estonia; LV, Latvia; LT, Lithuania.

The known distribution of tickborne encephalitis (TBE)–virus endemic areas and Ixodes ticks in northern Europe. Yellow: TBE-endemic areas, adapted from International Scientific Working Group on Tick-Borne Encephalitis (). To the south and west from the solid line, Ixodes ricinus distribution; to the east from the dashed line, I. persulcatus distribution; Lpr, Lappeenranta; EST, Estonia; LV, Latvia; LT, Lithuania. In Finland, the TBE-endemic areas are mostly in the coastal regions: two thirds of cases come from the Åland Islands. Other TBE-endemic regions include the Archipelago of Turku, a focus in Isosaari (an island outside Helsinki), the Lappeenranta region in southeastern Finland, and the Archipelago of Kokkola in western Finland (). The virus was found in the same areas (except for Isosaari) as early as the 1960s by screening antibodies to TBEV from cattle sera (). The TBE focus in the Archipelago of Kokkola (63°50´N, 23°10´E), ≈300 km south of the Arctic Circle, has a peculiar location; it is an isolated focus, far from other TBE-endemic areas, and is the northernmost TBE-endemic area known. Furthermore, the recent TBE cases have been severe with sequelae (,). A cluster of cases in 2002 led us to study ticks in the Kokkola Archipelago for TBEV.

The Study

A total of 1,181 ticks were collected by flagging in the Archipelago of Kokkola in June 2004 (Table 1). In the tick-collecting areas 1–7, TBE patients had reported tick bites, and in areas 8–10, no TBE cases have been found. All the locations were islands or peninsulas within 20 km of each other.
Table 1

Tick collection sites in Kokkola Archipelago, June 2004*

LocationTBE case-patient, sex/age/yNo. ticks (n/f/m)No. tick poolsTick pools positive in RT-PCR†Tick pools positive in virus isolation†
1M/48/2004 (12)184 (19/87/78)194, 8, 98, 9
2M/21/2002 (11)80 (24/25/31)825, 2625, 26
3F/24/2002 (11)158 (2/87/69)163939
4F/12/2002 (11)474 (16/227/231)4879, 81, 84, 85, 86, 102, 11879, 81, 84, 86, 102, 118
5F/73/2002 (11)41 (2/22/17)5ND
6M/6/2003166 (6/83/77)17ND
7M/7/20036 (0/3/3)1ND
8No known cases55 (1/25/29)6ND
9No known cases9 (2/5/2)1ND
10No known cases8 (0/6/2)1ND

*TBE, tickborne encephalitis; RT-PCR, reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction; n, nymphs; f, adult females; m, adult males; ND, not determined.
†Nos. indicate the tick pool numbers, the same as used in the phylogenetic tree.

*TBE, tickborne encephalitis; RT-PCR, reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction; n, nymphs; f, adult females; m, adult males; ND, not determined.
†Nos. indicate the tick pool numbers, the same as used in the phylogenetic tree. The ticks were homogenized in pools of ≈10 with Dulbecco phosphate-buffered saline plus 0.2% bovine serum albumin (D-PBS-BSA) and sand to 122 pools. RNA was isolated from 100 μL of the pools by TriPure Isolation Reagent (Roche Diagnostics, Espoo, Finland). The RNA was dissolved in 20 μL diethyl pyrocarbonate–treated water, and 10 μL was used for nested reverse transcription (RT)–PCR, amplifying a 252-nt sequence from the TBEV-NS5 gene to detect TBEV-RNA according to Puchhammer-Stöckl et al. (), except that the outer forward primer used was 5´-ggaggctgaacaactgcac-3´. TBEV-RNA was detected in 13 pools (each consisted of 10 adult ticks) (Table 1). Assuming that only 1 tick in a positive pool was positive for TBEV RNA, the overall TBEV prevalence was 1.1%. To isolate TBEV strains from the RT-PCR–positive tick pools, 20 μL of the supernatant of the pools diluted 1:1 in D-PBS-BSA was injected intracerebrally into suckling NMRI mice. One litter of suckling mice was used for each pool. The mice were followed for 14 days or until symptoms of illness appeared, and then they were killed. From 200 μL of the homogenized mouse brains, diluted 1:5 with D-PBS-BSA, RNA was extracted by TriPure, and RT-PCR for the partial TBEV-E gene was performed. The cDNA was produced with the reverse primer 5´-ccyccagccargagraagc-3´ by M-MuLV-RT enzyme (Fermentas, Vilnius, Lithuania), and subsequent PCR was performed with this and a forward primer 5´-aacagggaytttgtcactggyactc-3´ by Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas) (detailed RT-PCR protocol available from the authors upon request). A region of 205 nt from the NS5 gene from the RT-PCR–positive tick pools and 1,225-nt stretch from the E gene from the brains of the infected suckling mice were sequenced (GenBank accession nos. in Table 2). Unexpectedly, based on the partial NS5 sequences from the RT-PCR–positive tick pools (data not shown), the TBEV strains in Kokkola belonged to the Siberian subtype of TBEV. A phylogenetic tree based on the partial E gene sequences (1,076 nt) obtained from the TBEV isolates was prepared by the maximum likelihood method (Figure 2, scripts and datasets available from the authors upon request). Within the 1,076-nt stretch of the E gene, the Kokkola strains were >99.6% identical to each other. The closest relatives were Latvia-1-96 (97% identical) and the Estonian strains Est54, Est3535, and EK328 (95%–96%). Consequently, the Siberian subtype strains isolated from Finland and nearby Baltic states form a lineage together within the Siberian subtype. Other Siberian subtype strains Vasilchenko, Aina, Zausaev, and TBEV228 showed 92%–94% identity, and the European and Far Eastern subtypes showed 84%–86% identity. However, the vector tick species for Siberian-type TBEV, I. persulcatus, was not known to exist in Finland. This knowledge led us to study the tick species more carefully. DNA was isolated from 20 tick pools by TriPure and resuspended in 100 μL of TE (Tris-HCl 10 mmol/L, EDTA 1 mmol/L, pH ≈8). The tick species was determined as I. persulcatus by amplifying an average of 339 bp from mitochondrial 16S RNA gene by PCR and subsequent sequencing according to Caporale et al. (). Because the ticks were pooled and homogenized before species identification, 30 adult ticks from the same region collected later in the summer were examined microscopically. All these specimens were I. persulcatus by morphologic criteria.
Table 2

TBE virus strains compared by sequence analysis*

StrainGeographic originGenBank accession no.
Kokkola 4Location 1, KokkolaDQ451297†
Kokkola 8Location 1, KokkolaDQ451298,† DQ451286‡
Kokkola 9Location 1, KokkolaDQ451299,† DQ451287‡
Kokkola 25Location 2, KokkolaDQ451300,† ,DQ451288‡
Kokkola 26Location 2, KokkolaDQ451301,† DQ451289‡
Kokkola 39Location 3, KokkolaDQ451302,† DQ451290‡
Kokkola 79Location 4, KokkolaDQ451303†DQ451291‡
Kokkola 81Location 4, KokkolaDQ451304,†DQ451292‡
Kokkola 84Location 4, KokkolaDQ451305,†DQ451293‡
Kokkola 85Location 4, KokkolaDQ451306†
Kokkola 86Location 4, KokkolaDQ451307,†DQ451294‡
Kokkola 102Location 4, KokkolaDQ451308,†DQ451295‡
Kokkola 118Location 4, KokkolaDQ451309,†DQ451296‡
Iso40Isosaari, FinlandAJ298323
Kumlinge A 52Åland, FinlandX60286
Est54EstoniaDQ393773
Est3535EstoniaDQ393774
Est2546EstoniaDQ393779
Est3476EstoniaDQ393776
Latvia 1–96LatviaAJ415565
RK1424LatviaAF091016
NeudoerflAustriaU27495
HyprCzech RepublicU39292
263Czech RepublicU27491
ZausaevSiberia, RussiaAF527415
VasilchenkoNovosibirsk, RussiaL40361
AinaIrkutsk, RussiaAF091006
EK-328EstoniaDQ486861
TBEV228Novosibirsk region, RussiaDQ385498
TBEV1467Novosibirsk region, RussiaAY753582
Sofjin-HOPrimorskii Kray, RussiaAB062064
Oshima 5–10Hokkaido, JapanAB062063
LIVUnited KingdomNC 001809
OHFV, strain BogoluvovskaRussiaAY193805
LangatMalaysiaAF253419
Powassan, LB strainUnited StatesNC 003687

*TBE, tickborne encephalitis; LIV, Louping ill virus; OHFV, Omsk hemorrhagic fever virus.
†Accession no. for the partial NS5 gene sequence.
‡Accession no. for the partial E gene sequence.

Figure 2

Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of partial E gene (1,076 nt). The bar below indicates the nucleotide substitutions per site. The accession nos. of the strains used can be seen in Table 2. The bootstrap support values <50 are not shown.

*TBE, tickborne encephalitis; LIV, Louping ill virus; OHFV, Omsk hemorrhagic fever virus.
†Accession no. for the partial NS5 gene sequence.
‡Accession no. for the partial E gene sequence. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of partial E gene (1,076 nt). The bar below indicates the nucleotide substitutions per site. The accession nos. of the strains used can be seen in Table 2. The bootstrap support values <50 are not shown.

Conclusions

A TBE focus has existed in the Kokkola Archipelago at least since the 1960s when TBEV antibodies were detected in cattle (), but the local TBE viruses have not been characterized. A cluster of severe human cases in the beginning of the 2000s prompted us to carry out the present study. In June 2004, we collected 1,181 ticks from the Archipelago of Kokkola and detected TBEV-RNA in 13 pools. Eleven were also positive in virus isolation. The sequences showed that the strains belonged to the Siberian subtype, whereas in the other Finnish TBE-endemic foci, only European subtype TBEV closely related to the central European strains has previously been detected (). Furthermore, the tick species was I. persulcatus. Our results show that both I. persulcatus and the Siberian type TBEV are occurring several hundreds of kilometers further to northwest than what has been known previously. Because the 2 tick species are similar to the naked eye and in their behavior, and published data on distribution of Ixodes ticks in Finland are sparse and outdated, we cannot exclude the possibility that I. persulcatus also exists unnoticed elsewhere in Finland. More tick surveys and epidemiologic studies are needed to map the distribution areas of the 2 vector species and of the different TBEV subtypes in Finland. However, in our recent tick collections from Åland and southern (Isosaari, 60°N, 25°E) and eastern (Lappeenranta, 61°N, 28°E, and Joensuu, 62°N, 29°E) Finland, all ticks were I. ricinus. Some researchers have found indications that the Siberian TBEV might cause more severe or more persistent forms of TBE than the European subtype (), and 3 of 5 recent human TBE cases in Kokkola have been severe (,). However, the number of cases studied from Kokkola is too small for firm conclusions on the severity of the local disease.
  13 in total

1.  Distribution and characterization of tick-borne encephalitis viruses from Siberia and far-eastern Asia.

Authors:  Daisuke Hayasaka; Leonid Ivanov; Galina N Leonova; Akiko Goto; Kentaro Yoshii; Tetsuya Mizutani; Hiroaki Kariwa; Ikuo Takashima
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.891

2.  Sequence analysis and genetic classification of tick-borne encephalitis viruses from Europe and Asia.

Authors:  M Ecker; S L Allison; T Meixner; F X Heinz
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.891

3.  Gadolinium enhancement of cauda equina: a new MR imaging finding in the radiculitic form of tick-borne encephalitis.

Authors:  S Marjelund; A Jaaskelainen; T Tikkakoski; S Tuisku; O Vapalahti
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Tick-borne viral encephalitis in Finland. The clinical features of Kumlinge disease during 1959-1987.

Authors:  P Wahlberg; P Saikku; M Brummer-Korvenkontio
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 8.989

5.  Characterization of tick-borne encephalitis virus from Latvia: evidence for co-circulation of three distinct subtypes.

Authors:  S Vene; I Golovljova; V Mavtchoutko; M Forsgren; V Kalnina; A Plyusnin
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.327

6.  Discriminating between Ixodes ticks by means of mitochondrial DNA sequences.

Authors:  D A Caporale; S M Rich; A Spielman; S R Telford; T D Kocher
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.286

7.  Antibodies against viruses of the tick-borne encephalitis group in cattle sera in Finland.

Authors:  J Tuomi; M Brummer-Korvenkontio
Journal:  Ann Med Exp Biol Fenn       Date:  1965

8.  Prevalence of tick-borne encephalitis virus in Ixodes ricinus ticks in Finland.

Authors:  X Han; M Aho; S Vene; M Peltomaa; A Vaheri; O Vapalahti
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.327

9.  Characterization of tick-borne encephalitis virus from Estonia.

Authors:  Irina Golovljova; Sirkka Vene; Katarina Brus Sjölander; Veera Vasilenko; Alexander Plyusnin; Ake Lundkvist
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.327

10.  Geographical distribution, host associations, and vector roles of ticks (Acari: Ixodidae, Argasidae) in Sweden.

Authors:  T G Jaenson; L Tälleklint; L Lundqvist; B Olsen; J Chirico; H Mejlon
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.278

View more
  28 in total

1.  First complete genomic characterization of two tick-borne encephalitis virus isolates obtained from wild rodents in South Korea.

Authors:  Seok-Min Yun; Su Yeon Kim; Young Ran Ju; Myung Guk Han; Young Eui Jeong; Jungsang Ryou
Journal:  Virus Genes       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 2.332

Review 2.  Update on tick-borne rickettsioses around the world: a geographic approach.

Authors:  Philippe Parola; Christopher D Paddock; Cristina Socolovschi; Marcelo B Labruna; Oleg Mediannikov; Tahar Kernif; Mohammad Yazid Abdad; John Stenos; Idir Bitam; Pierre-Edouard Fournier; Didier Raoult
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Tick-borne encephalitis in the age of general mobility.

Authors:  Jochen Süss; Olaf Kahl; Horst Aspöck; Kathrin Hartelt; Antii Vaheri; Rainer Oehme; Gunnar Hasle; Hans Dautel; Christian Kunz; Nerija Kupreviciene; Sarah Randolph; Hans-Peter Zimmermann; Barry Atkinson; Gerhard Dobler; Kuulo Kutsar; Franz X Heinz; Robert Steffen
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2010-02

Review 4.  Epidemiology and distribution of tick-borne encephalitis.

Authors:  Gerhard Dobler; Dieter Gniel; Robert Petermann; Martin Pfeffer
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2012-06-15

5.  A 4-year study of a natural tick-borne encephalitis virus focus in Hungary, 2010-2013.

Authors:  Viktor Zöldi; Tibor Papp; Krisztina Rigó; János Farkas; László Egyed
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 3.184

Review 6.  Why is tick-borne encephalitis increasing? A review of the key factors causing the increasing incidence of human TBE in Sweden.

Authors:  Thomas G T Jaenson; Marika Hjertqvist; Tomas Bergström; Ake Lundkvist
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 3.876

7.  Prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato and Anaplasma phagocytophilum in questing Ixodes ricinus ticks in relation to the density of wild cervids.

Authors:  Olav Rosef; Algimantas Paulauskas; Jana Radzijevskaja
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 1.695

8.  Non-hemagglutinating flaviviruses: molecular mechanisms for the emergence of new strains via adaptation to European ticks.

Authors:  Maxim A Khasnatinov; Katarina Ustanikova; Tatiana V Frolova; Vanda V Pogodina; Nadezshda G Bochkova; Ludmila S Levina; Mirko Slovak; Maria Kazimirova; Milan Labuda; Boris Klempa; Elena Eleckova; Ernest A Gould; Tamara S Gritsun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Tickborne encephalitis, southwestern France.

Authors:  Bruno Herpe; Isabelle Schuffenecker; Jérome Pillot; Denis Malvy; Benjamin Clouzeau; Nam Bui; Frederic Vargas; Didier Gruson; Hervé Zeller; Marie E Lafon; Hervé Fleury; Gilles Hilbert
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 6.883

10.  Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus Structural Proteins Are the Primary Viral Determinants of Non-Viraemic Transmission between Ticks whereas Non-Structural Proteins Affect Cytotoxicity.

Authors:  Maxim A Khasnatinov; Andrew Tuplin; Dmitri J Gritsun; Mirko Slovak; Maria Kazimirova; Martina Lickova; Sabina Havlikova; Boris Klempa; Milan Labuda; Ernest A Gould; Tamara S Gritsun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.