Literature DB >> 17176430

Attentional cues in real scenes, saccadic targeting, and Bayesian priors.

Miguel P Eckstein1, Barbara A Drescher, Steven S Shimozaki.   

Abstract

Performance finding a target improves when artificial cues direct covert attention to the target's probable location or locations, but how do predictive cues help observers search for objects in real scenes? Controlling for target detectability and retinal eccentricity, we recorded observers' first saccades during search for objects that appeared in expected and unexpected locations within real scenes. As has been found with synthetic images and cues, accuracy of first saccades was significantly higher when the target appeared at an expected location rather than an unexpected location. Observers' saccades with target-absent images make it possible to distinguish two mechanisms that might mediate this effect: limited attentional resources versus differential weighting of information (Bayesian priors). Endpoints of first saccades in target-absent images were significantly closer to the expected than the unexpected locations, a result consistent with the differential-weighting model and inconsistent with limited resources being the sole mechanism underlying the effect.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17176430     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01815.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  60 in total

1.  The attraction of visual attention to texts in real-world scenes.

Authors:  Hsueh-Cheng Wang; Marc Pomplun
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Contingent capture in cueing: the role of color search templates and cue-target color relations.

Authors:  Ulrich Ansorge; Stefanie I Becker
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-06-27

Review 3.  A theory of eye movements during target acquisition.

Authors:  Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Tactical determinants of setting zone in elite men's volleyball.

Authors:  Jose Afonso; Francisca Esteves; Rui Araújo; Luke Thomas; Isabel Mesquita
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  Modeling guidance and recognition in categorical search: bridging human and computer object detection.

Authors:  Gregory J Zelinsky; Yifan Peng; Alexander C Berg; Dimitris Samaras
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Prevalence effects in newly trained airport checkpoint screeners: trained observers miss rare targets, too.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; David N Brunelli; Joshua Rubinstein; Todd S Horowitz
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  In visual search, guidance by surface type is different than classic guidance.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Ester Reijnen; Michael J Van Wert; Yoana Kuzmova
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Both memory and attention systems contribute to visual search for targets cued by implicitly learned context.

Authors:  Barry Giesbrecht; Jocelyn L Sy; Scott A Guerin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Modeling Search for People in 900 Scenes: A combined source model of eye guidance.

Authors:  Krista A Ehinger; Barbara Hidalgo-Sotelo; Antonio Torralba; Aude Oliva
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2009-08-01

10.  Visual memory during pauses between successive saccades.

Authors:  Timothy M Gersch; Eileen Kowler; Brian S Schnitzer; Barbara A Dosher
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-12-22       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.