Literature DB >> 17176327

Evaluation of prenatal RHD typing strategies on cell-free fetal DNA from maternal plasma.

Martine G H M Grootkerk-Tax1, Aicha Ait Soussan, Masja de Haas, Petra A Maaskant-van Wijk, C Ellen van der Schoot.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The discovery of cell-free fetal DNA in maternal plasma led to the development of assays to predict the fetal D status with RHD-specific sequences. Few assays are designed in such a way that the fetus can be typed in RHDpsi mothers and that RHDpsi fetuses are correctly typed. Owing to the limited knowledge about the mechanism responsible for the presence of fetal DNA in maternal plasma, precautions in developing prenatal genotyping strategies must be made. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Real-time quantitative (RQ)-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays were developed for prenatal diagnostic use with cell-free fetal DNA from maternal plasma. An RQ-PCR assay on RHD exon 5 (amplicon 361 bp), negative on RHDpsi, was developed with genomic DNA and evaluated with cell-free fetal DNA. A previously published RHD exon 5 RQ-PCR (amplicon 82 bp) was duplexed with an in-house developed RHD exon 7 RQ-PCR and evaluated with cell-free fetal DNA from pregnant D-RHDpsi+ women.
RESULTS: The RHD exon 5 361 bp assay showed on cell-free plasma DNA from D- women carrying a D+ fetus, low amplification levels, resulting in high Ct values and false-negative results. Owing to fragmentation of cell-free plasma DNA, too few DNA stretches of sufficient length (> 360 bp) are present. The RHD exon 5 82 bp and exon 7 RQ-PCR duplex was evaluated with RHDpsi+ cell-free plasma DNA and showed complete specificity and maximal sensitivity.
CONCLUSION: Assays designed for prenatal genotyping should be developed and evaluated on cell-free plasma DNA. Prenatal RHD typing is accurate with the RHD exon 5 82 bp and exon 7 duplex strategy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17176327     DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2006.01044.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  6 in total

1.  Prenatal RhD Testing: A Review of Studies Published from 2006 to 2008.

Authors:  Tobias Jörg Legler; Sina Patricia Müller; Alexander Haverkamp; Simon Grill; Sinuhe Hahn
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 3.747

2.  Comparison of PCR methods for detecting fetal RhDin maternal plasma.

Authors:  Johanna Atamaniuk; Karl M Stuhlmeier; Alireza Karimi; Mathias M Mueller
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.352

3.  Sensitivity of fetal RHD screening for safe guidance of targeted anti-D immunoglobulin prophylaxis: prospective cohort study of a nationwide programme in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Masja de Haas; Florentine F Thurik; Catharina P B van der Ploeg; Barbera Veldhuisen; Hoang Hirschberg; Aicha Ait Soussan; Heleen Woortmeijer; Frithjofna Abbink; Godelieve C M L Page-Christiaens; Peter G Scheffer; C Ellen van der Schoot
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-11-07

4.  Performance of Droplet Digital PCR in Non-Invasive Fetal RHD Genotyping - Comparison with a Routine Real-Time PCR Based Approach.

Authors:  Iveta Svobodová; Eva Pazourková; Aleš Hořínek; Michaela Novotná; Pavel Calda; Marie Korabečná
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Comparing the Efficiency of Three Protocols in Isolation of Cell Free Fetal DNA From Maternal Blood.

Authors:  Fatemeh Karami; Mohammad Reza Noori Daloii; Seddigheh Hantooshzadeh; Mohammad Hossein Modarressi
Journal:  J Family Reprod Health       Date:  2017-09

6.  Diagnostic performance of the noninvasive prenatal FetoGnost RhD assay for the prediction of the fetal RhD blood group status.

Authors:  Tobias J Legler; Sandra Lührig; Irina Korschineck; Dieter Schwartz
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 2.344

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.