Literature DB >> 17176257

Gliding motility and polarized slime secretion.

Rosa Yu1, Dale Kaiser.   

Abstract

Myxococcus leaves a trail of slime on agar as it moves. A filament of slime can be seen attached to the end of a cell, but it is seen only at one end at any particular moment. To identify genes essential for A motility, transposon insertion mutations with defective A motility were studied. Fifteen of the 33 mutants had totally lost A motility. All these mutant cells had filaments of slime emerging from both ends, indicating that bipolar secretion prevents A motility. The remaining 18 A motility mutants, also produced by gene knockout, secreted slime only from one pole, but they swarmed at a lower rate than A(+) and are called 'partial' gliding mutants, or pgl. For each pgl mutant, the reduction in swarm expansion rate was directly proportional to the reduction in the coefficient of elasticotaxis. The pgl mutants have a normal reversal frequency and normal gliding speed when they move. But their probability of movement per unit time is lower than pgl(+) cells. Many of the pgl mutants are produced by transposon insertions in glycosyltransferase genes. It is proposed that these glycosyltransferases carry out the synthesis of a repeat unit polysaccharide that constitutes the slime.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17176257     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05536.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Microbiol        ISSN: 0950-382X            Impact factor:   3.501


  44 in total

1.  Identification of the cglC, cglD, cglE, and cglF genes and their role in cell contact-dependent gliding motility in Myxococcus xanthus.

Authors:  Darshankumar T Pathak; Daniel Wall
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Wet-surface-enhanced ellipsometric contrast microscopy identifies slime as a major adhesion factor during bacterial surface motility.

Authors:  Adrien Ducret; Marie-Pierre Valignat; Fabrice Mouhamar; Tâm Mignot; Olivier Theodoly
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Modeling local interactions during the motion of cyanobacteria.

Authors:  Amanda Galante; Susanne Wisen; Devaki Bhaya; Doron Levy
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2012-06-17       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 4.  Myxobacteria, polarity, and multicellular morphogenesis.

Authors:  Dale Kaiser; Mark Robinson; Lee Kroos
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 5.  Gliding motility revisited: how do the myxobacteria move without flagella?

Authors:  Emilia M F Mauriello; Tâm Mignot; Zhaomin Yang; David R Zusman
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 11.056

6.  Cell division resets polarity and motility for the bacterium Myxococcus xanthus.

Authors:  Cameron W Harvey; Chinedu S Madukoma; Shant Mahserejian; Mark S Alber; Joshua D Shrout
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Bacterial Surface Spreading Is More Efficient on Nematically Aligned Polysaccharide Substrates.

Authors:  David J Lemon; Derek A Schutzman; Anthony G Garza
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Bacterial signaling and motility: sure bets.

Authors:  Robert Belas; Igor B Zhulin; Zhaomin Yang
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Bacterial motility complexes require the actin-like protein, MreB and the Ras homologue, MglA.

Authors:  Emilia M F Mauriello; Fabrice Mouhamar; Beiyan Nan; Adrien Ducret; David Dai; David R Zusman; Tâm Mignot
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 10.  Deciphering the hunting strategy of a bacterial wolfpack.

Authors:  James E Berleman; John R Kirby
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2009-05-09       Impact factor: 16.408

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.