Literature DB >> 17176179

Use of a multiple-choice procedure with college student drinkers.

Carrie Little1, Christopher J Correia.   

Abstract

The Multiple-Choice Procedure (MCP) was developed to investigate the relationship between drug preferences and alternative reinforcers. The current studies were designed to validate survey and laboratory versions of the MCP with college student drinkers. In Study 1, 320 undergraduates with a recent history of alcohol consumption used a survey version of the MCP to make 120 discrete hypothetical choices between two amounts of alcohol and escalating amounts of money delivered immediately or after a 1-week delay. In Study 2, 21 undergraduates completed a laboratory version of the MCP to make 120 discrete choices involving real alcohol and monetary payments. Responses to both versions of the MCP were related to measures of alcohol use and varied as a function of delay associated with the money choice. Responses to the survey version of the MCP also varied as a function of the amount of alcohol hypothetically available. The results of the 2 studies are consistent with a behavioral choice perspective of alcohol use, which focuses on preferences in the context of competing alternative reinforcers. (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17176179     DOI: 10.1037/0893-164X.20.4.445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav        ISSN: 0893-164X


  10 in total

1.  Is talk "cheap"? An initial investigation of the equivalence of alcohol purchase task performance for hypothetical and actual rewards.

Authors:  Michael T Amlung; John Acker; Monika K Stojek; James G Murphy; James MacKillop
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 2.  The role of human drug self-administration procedures in the development of medications.

Authors:  S D Comer; J B Ashworth; R W Foltin; C E Johanson; J P Zacny; S L Walsh
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 4.492

3.  Using the Multiple-Choice Procedure to Measure the Relative Reinforcing Efficacy of Gambling: Initial Validity Evidence Among College Students.

Authors:  Leon H Butler; Jessica G Irons; Drew T Bassett; Christopher J Correia
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2018-06

4.  The behavioral economics of young adult substance abuse.

Authors:  James G Murphy; Ashley A Dennhardt
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Validity of a demand curve measure of nicotine reinforcement with adolescent smokers.

Authors:  James G Murphy; James MacKillop; Jennifer W Tidey; Linda A Brazil; Suzanne M Colby
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 4.492

6.  The effect of drink price and next-day responsibilities on college student drinking: a behavioral economic analysis.

Authors:  Jessica R Skidmore; James G Murphy
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2011-03

7.  Modest abuse-related subjective effects of zolpidem in drug-naive volunteers.

Authors:  Stephanie C Licata; Yasmin Mashhoon; Robert R Maclean; Scott E Lukas
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.293

Review 8.  Quantifying reinforcement value and demand for psychoactive substances in humans.

Authors:  Adrienne J Heinz; Todd C Lilje; Jon D Kassel; Harriet de Wit
Journal:  Curr Drug Abuse Rev       Date:  2012-12

Review 9.  Clinical models of decision making in addiction.

Authors:  Mikhail N Koffarnus; Brent A Kaplan
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2017-08-26       Impact factor: 3.533

10.  Smokers report greater demand for alcohol on a behavioral economic purchase task.

Authors:  Ali M Yurasek; James G Murphy; Ashley Hum Clawson; Ashley A Dennhardt; James MacKillop
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.582

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.