Literature DB >> 17175212

Healing of an ulnar defect using a proprietary TCP bone graft substitute, JAX, in association with autologous osteogenic cells and growth factors.

S A Clarke1, N L Hoskins, G R Jordan, D R Marsh.   

Abstract

Currently, available synthetic bone substitutes have adequate osteoconductive properties but have little or no osteoinductivity. Recent research has focused on using osteogenic growth factors or cells to provide this. JAX is a beta tricalcium phosphate bone graft substitute that has a novel shape and interlocking design. This study investigated delivery methods and the use of autologous cell therapy to enhance healing of a bone defect using JAX as a scaffold. Bone marrow was harvested from 24 New Zealand White rabbits. The mononuclear cell fraction was isolated and culture expanded. Bilateral 1.5 cm defects in the ulna were filled with: Group 1: JAX alone, Group 2: JAX plus 1x10(7) autologous BMSCs injected at the time of surgery, Group 3: JAX plus 8x10(6) autologous BMSCs cultured on granules for 14 days prior to surgery, Group 4: JAX plus fresh bone marrow (BMA), Group 5: cortical autograft, Group 6: JAX plus 2.5 microg VEGF. Radiographs demonstrated that there was more new bone in the BMA and VEGF groups compared to JAX alone. Groups containing autologous BMSCs were only slightly better than JAX alone in the amount of bone in the defect but did improve bridging of the osteotomy. Histomorphometry identified a significant increase in bone volume in the BMA group compared to JAX alone. BMA and VEGF enhanced healing of bone defects whereas expanded BMSCs provided little advantage over scaffold alone. There was no difference between delivery methods of autologous BMSCs. These observations suggest that the provision of osteogenic cells alone is insufficient to enhance bone healing and that additional factors are required to initiate this process in vivo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17175212     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2006.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  6 in total

1.  Nano-ceramic composite scaffolds for bioreactor-based bone engineering.

Authors:  Qing Lv; Meng Deng; Bret D Ulery; Lakshmi S Nair; Cato T Laurencin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Taking cues from the extracellular matrix to design bone-mimetic regenerative scaffolds.

Authors:  Andrew S Curry; Nicholas W Pensa; Abby M Barlow; Susan L Bellis
Journal:  Matrix Biol       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 11.583

Review 3.  Strategies to Stimulate Mobilization and Homing of Endogenous Stem and Progenitor Cells for Bone Tissue Repair.

Authors:  Marietta Herrmann; Sophie Verrier; Mauro Alini
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2015-06-02

4.  Bone Substitute Effect on Vascularization and Bone Remodeling after Application of phVEGF165 Transfected BMSC.

Authors:  Florian Geiger; Mirjam Beverungen; Helga Lorenz; Julia Wieland; Michael Fehr; Philip Kasten
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2012-04-19

5.  Enhanced release of calcium phosphate additives from bioresorbable orthopaedic devices using irradiation technology is non-beneficial in a rabbit model: An animal study.

Authors:  I Palmer; S A Clarke; F J Buchanan
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 5.853

6.  Repair of Critical Size Bone Defects Using Synthetic Hydroxyapatite or Xenograft with or without the Bone Marrow Mononuclear Fraction: A Histomorphometric and Immunohistochemical Study in Rat Calvaria.

Authors:  Jorge Luís da Silva Pires; Jorge José de Carvalho; Mario José Dos Santos Pereira; Igor da Silva Brum; Ana Lucia Rosa Nascimento; Paulo Gonçalo Pinto Dos Santos; Lucio Frigo; Ricardo Guimaraes Fischer
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 3.623

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.