Literature DB >> 17174100

Fractional flow reserve of pedicled internal thoracic artery and saphenous vein grafts 6 months after bypass surgery.

David Glineur1, Alain Poncelet, Gebrine El Khoury, William D'hoore, Parla Astarci, Francis Zech, Philippe Noirhomme, Claude Hanet.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although the internal thoracic artery was proven superior to saphenous vein graft in long-term patency, it is thought to be a more resistive conduit than the vein graft. Moreover, patency studies comparing both left and right internal thoracic arteries have provided results favoring the former. Fractional flow reserve is an established functional index of coronary blood flow.
METHODS: To compare the fractional flow reserve between both internal thoracic arteries and saphenous vein grafts, 43 bypass grafts were studied 6 months after revascularization. Intra-graft pressures were measured during cardiac catheterization using a pressure-wire advanced to the first distal anastomosis of 12 left internal thoracic arteries (ITAs), 10 right ITAs and of 21 vein grafts. Pressure gradients between the aorta and the graft were measured at baseline and during a maximal hyperemia.
RESULTS: At baseline, pressure gradient was recorded in the left ITA (2.9+/-2.2 mmHg), in the right ITA (1.2+/-1.2 mmHg) and in the vein graft (0.4+/-0.7 mmHg). During maximal hyperemia, pressure gradient increased to 9.6+/-3.2 mmHg in left ITA, to 4.5+/-2.0 mmHg in the right ITA (p<0.001 vs left ITA) and to 3.3+/-2.7 mmHg in vein (p<0.001 vs left ITA; NS vs right ITA). Fractional flow reserve was 0.90+/-0.04 in left ITA, 0.95+/-0.03 in right ITA (p<0.01 vs left ITA) and 0.96+/-0.03 in vein (p<0.001 vs left ITA).
CONCLUSION: Internal thoracic arteries and saphenous vein grafts allow myocardial revascularization with minimal resistance to maximal blood flow. The resistance appears significantly higher in left ITA compared to both the right ITA and venous grafts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17174100     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.11.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  6 in total

1.  A meta-analysis comparing bilateral internal mammary artery with left internal mammary artery for coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Aaron J Weiss; Shan Zhao; David H Tian; David P Taggart; Tristan D Yan
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-07

2.  Understanding coronary artery bypass transit time flow curves: role of bypass graft compliance.

Authors:  Matija Jelenc; Blaž Jelenc; Tomislav Klokočovnik; Nikola Lakič; Borut Geršak; Ivan Kneževic
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-10-30

3.  Contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI before coronary artery bypass surgery: impact of myocardial scar extent on bypass flow.

Authors:  Peter Hunold; Parwis Massoudy; Claudia Boehm; Thomas Schlosser; Kai Nassenstein; Stephan Knipp; Holger Eggebrecht; Matthias Thielmann; Raimund Erbel; Heinz Jakob; Jörg Barkhausen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Thirty-year experience with bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting: where have we been and where are we going?

Authors:  Paul Kurlansky
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Non-invasive Ischaemia Testing in Patients With Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Technical Challenges, Limitations, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Andreas Seraphim; Kristopher D Knott; Joao B Augusto; Katia Menacho; Sara Tyebally; Benjamin Dowsing; Sanjeev Bhattacharyya; Leon J Menezes; Daniel A Jones; Rakesh Uppal; James C Moon; Charlotte Manisty
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-12-23

6.  What should be the role of fractional flow reserve measurement in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting?

Authors:  David Glineur; Aun Yeong Chong; Juan Grau
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2020-11-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.