OBJECTIVE: To assess the diversity of oviposition containers and buildings where females of Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti can be found. METHODS: A study was carried out in the city of Rio de Janeiro, Southern Brazil, between 2002 and 2003. Larvae in different types of buildings were investigated, and immature forms found were then sent to the laboratory for identification. The larval frequency for both mosquitoes was estimated in the oviposition containers available. The Breteau index and the building infestation index were calculated and differences were tested using the Chi-square test. RESULTS: The types of buildings that were positive for Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti were: dwellings (83.9%); churches, schools, clubs (6.8%); vacant land (6.4%); and businesses (2.8%). Of 9,153 larvae collected, 12.0% were Aedes albopictus and 88.0% were Aedes aegypti. Aedes albopictus were mostly found in drains (25.4%); cans, bottles, empty bottles (23.9%); and plant vases (16.2%). Aedes aegypti was much more frequently found than Aedes albopictus (chi(2)=145.067; p<0.001). Both species were significantly more frequent in artificial than in natural oviposition containers (chi(2)=31.46; p<0.001). The building infestation index and Breteau index for Aedes albopictus were 0.3% and 0.28% in 2002 and 0.4% and 0.5 in 2003, respectively. For Aedes aegypti, they were 1.0%, 1.16 in 2002 and 3.5% and 4.35 in 2003, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The present study assessed the frequencies of Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti females in various types of oviposition containers and types of buildings. The abundant availability of artificial containers in dwellings, associated with the capacity of Ae. albopictus to be also found in natural oviposition containers, has greatly contributed for their gradual adaptation to human environment.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the diversity of oviposition containers and buildings where females of Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti can be found. METHODS: A study was carried out in the city of Rio de Janeiro, Southern Brazil, between 2002 and 2003. Larvae in different types of buildings were investigated, and immature forms found were then sent to the laboratory for identification. The larval frequency for both mosquitoes was estimated in the oviposition containers available. The Breteau index and the building infestation index were calculated and differences were tested using the Chi-square test. RESULTS: The types of buildings that were positive for Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti were: dwellings (83.9%); churches, schools, clubs (6.8%); vacant land (6.4%); and businesses (2.8%). Of 9,153 larvae collected, 12.0% were Aedes albopictus and 88.0% were Aedes aegypti. Aedes albopictus were mostly found in drains (25.4%); cans, bottles, empty bottles (23.9%); and plant vases (16.2%). Aedes aegypti was much more frequently found than Aedes albopictus (chi(2)=145.067; p<0.001). Both species were significantly more frequent in artificial than in natural oviposition containers (chi(2)=31.46; p<0.001). The building infestation index and Breteau index for Aedes albopictus were 0.3% and 0.28% in 2002 and 0.4% and 0.5 in 2003, respectively. For Aedes aegypti, they were 1.0%, 1.16 in 2002 and 3.5% and 4.35 in 2003, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The present study assessed the frequencies of Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti females in various types of oviposition containers and types of buildings. The abundant availability of artificial containers in dwellings, associated with the capacity of Ae. albopictus to be also found in natural oviposition containers, has greatly contributed for their gradual adaptation to human environment.
Authors: Julián E García-Rejón; María Alba Loroño-Pino; José Arturo Farfán-Ale; Luis F Flores-Flores; Mildred P López-Uribe; Maria Del Rosario Najera-Vazquez; Guadalupe Nuñez-Ayala; Barry J Beaty; Lars Eisen Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Carlos M Baak-Baak; Roger Arana-Guardia; Nohemi Cigarroa-Toledo; Maria Alba Loroño-Pino; Guadalupe Reyes-Solis; Carlos Machain-Williams; Barry J Beaty; Lars Eisen; Julián E García-Rejón Journal: J Med Entomol Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 2.278
Authors: Alzeir Machado Rodrigues; Antonio Adailson Sousa Silva; Cleonilda Claita Carneiro Pinto; Dayanne Lima Dos Santos; José Claudio Carneiro de Freitas; Victor Emanuel Pessoa Martins; Selene Maia de Morais Journal: Pharmaceuticals (Basel) Date: 2019-07-26
Authors: Rafael Piovezan; Alexandre Visockas; Thiago Salomão de Azevedo; Cláudio José Von Zuben; Maria Anice Mureb Sallum Journal: Parasit Vectors Date: 2019-11-14 Impact factor: 3.876
Authors: Juliana Pérez-Pérez; Víctor Hugo Peña-García; Arley Calle-Tobón; Marcela Quimbayo-Forero; Raúl Rojo; Enrique Henao; Talya Shragai; Guillermo Rúa-Uribe Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-06 Impact factor: 3.390