Literature DB >> 17173004

The impact of disability compensation on long-term treatment outcomes of patients with sciatica due to a lumbar disc herniation.

Steven J Atlas1, Yuchiao Chang, Robert B Keller, Daniel E Singer, Yen A Wu, Richard A Deyo.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective, observational study.
OBJECTIVE: To compare long-term disability and health-related quality of life outcomes of individuals receiving or not receiving workers' compensation at baseline evaluation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Disability compensation has long been associated with poor clinical outcomes. However, most studies have assessed outcomes over short time periods using unvalidated measures without controlling for potential confounders.
METHOD: Patients with sciatica due to a herniated lumbar disc were treated by physicians in community based orthopedic, neurosurgical, and occupational medicine practices throughout Maine. Outcomes assessed included disability compensation and work status, and health-related quality of life, controlling for initial treatment received and factors predicting initial workers' compensation status.
RESULTS: Among 440 eligible patients, 172 (86%) receiving workers' compensation and 222 (92%) not receiving workers' compensation at baseline evaluation completed at least one follow-up between 5 and 10 years (80% completed 10-year). Baseline demographics, past back history, imaging findings, symptoms, functional status, and expectations significantly differed according to the patient's baseline workers' compensation status. After 5-10 years, most patients, regardless of baseline workers' compensation status (yes or no), were not receiving disability compensation (83% vs. 96%, respectively) and were employed (78% for both groups). However, workers' compensation patients were significantly more likely to be receiving disability compensation and had worse symptoms, functional status, and satisfaction outcomes. Outcome differences diminished in magnitude after controlling for baseline differences among patients receiving workers' compensation or not but continued to favor those not initially receiving workers' compensation. Initial treatment received, either surgical or nonsurgical, did not influence these findings.
CONCLUSIONS: Long-term employment and disability outcomes were favorable for most patients with a disc herniation, regardless of initial workers' compensation status. However, individuals initially receiving workers' compensation had worse disability and quality of life outcomes compared to individuals not receiving workers' compensation. Despite these differences, long-term work outcomes were similarly favorable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17173004     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000250325.87083.8d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  21 in total

1.  Predictors of Improvements in Pain Intensity in a National Cohort of Older Veterans With Chronic Pain.

Authors:  Steven K Dobscha; Travis I Lovejoy; Benjamin J Morasco; Anne E Kovas; Dawn M Peters; Kyle Hart; J Lucas Williams; Bentson H McFarland
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 5.820

2.  Severe Pain in Veterans: The Effect of Age and Sex, and Comparisons With the General Population.

Authors:  Richard L Nahin
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 5.820

3.  The impact of workers' compensation on outcomes of surgical and nonoperative therapy for patients with a lumbar disc herniation: SPORT.

Authors:  Steven J Atlas; Tor D Tosteson; Emily A Blood; Jonathan S Skinner; Glenn S Pransky; James N Weinstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Who should have surgery for an intervertebral disc herniation? Comparative effectiveness evidence from the spine patient outcomes research trial.

Authors:  Adam Pearson; Jon Lurie; Tor Tosteson; Wenyan Zhao; William Abdu; Sohail Mirza; James Weinstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Patient preferences and expectations for care: determinants in patients with lumbar intervertebral disc herniation.

Authors:  Jon D Lurie; Sigurd H Berven; Jennifer Gibson-Chambers; Tor Tosteson; Anna Tosteson; Serena S Hu; James N Weinstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Physiotherapists and use of low back pain guidelines: a qualitative study of the barriers and facilitators.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Côté; Marie-José Durand; Michel Tousignant; Stéphane Poitras
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2009-02-14

7.  Transforaminal epidural steroid injections prevent the need for surgery in patients with sciatica secondary to lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective case series.

Authors:  Neil A Manson; Melissa D McKeon; Edward P Abraham
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.089

8.  What is different about workers' compensation patients? Socioeconomic predictors of baseline disability status among patients with lumbar radiculopathy.

Authors:  Steven J Atlas; Tor D Tosteson; Brett Hanscom; Emily A Blood; Glenn S Pransky; William A Abdu; Gunnar B Andersson; James N Weinstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Who should undergo surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis? Treatment effect predictors in SPORT.

Authors:  Adam M Pearson; Jon D Lurie; Tor D Tosteson; Wenyan Zhao; William A Abdu; James N Weinstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Nonoperative treatment for lumbosacral radiculopathy: what factors predict treatment failure?

Authors:  Pradeep Suri; M Jake Carlson; James Rainville
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.