Literature DB >> 17171772

Pre-arrest diversion of people with mental illness: Literature review and international survey.

Kathleen Hartford1, Robert Carey, James Mendonca.   

Abstract

Mental health diversion is a process where alternatives to criminal sanctions are made available to persons with mental illness (PMI) who have come into contact with the law. One form of mental health diversion is pre-arrest, in which the police use their discretion in laying charges. Concomitant with the growth of pre-arrest diversion programs is a growing body of research devoted to the phenomenon. The purpose of this paper is to review the existing literature of pre-arrest diversion, and to report the results of an international survey of pre-arrest diversion programs we conducted to identify evidence-based practices. On the basis of our review and survey, we note that successful pre-trial programs appear to integrate relevant mental health, substance abuse and criminal justice agencies by having regular meetings between key personnel from the various agencies. Often, a liaison person with a mandate to effect strong leadership plays a key role in the coordination of various agencies. Streamlining services through the creation of an emergency drop-off center with a no-refusal policy for police cases is seen as crucial. While there is some indication that mentally ill offenders benefit from their participation in this form of diversion, the evaluative literature has not yet achieved the "critical mass" necessary to create generalizable, evidence-based knowledge. The absence of generally agreed-upon outcomes could lead to the inequitable application of basic principles of diversion. We suggest that indicators, benchmarks, and outcomes must be agreed upon if a comprehensive understanding of pre-arrest programs is to emerge. Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17171772     DOI: 10.1002/bsl.738

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Sci Law        ISSN: 0735-3936


  8 in total

1.  System- and Policy-Level Challenges to Full Implementation of the Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) Model.

Authors:  Michael T Compton; Beth Broussard; Dana Hankerson-Dyson; Shaily Krishan; Tarianna Stewart; Janet R Oliva; Amy C Watson
Journal:  J Police Crisis Negot       Date:  2010

2.  The "Gray Zone" of Police Work During Mental Health Encounters: Findings from an Observational Study in Chicago.

Authors:  Jennifer D Wood; Amy C Watson; Anjali J Fulambarker
Journal:  Police Q       Date:  2016-07-13

3.  The Crisis Intervention Team Model of Police Response to Mental Health Crises: A Primer for Mental Health Practitioners.

Authors:  Amy C Watson; Anjali J Fulambarker
Journal:  Best Pract Ment Health       Date:  2012-12

4.  Beyond police crisis intervention: moving "upstream" to manage cases and places of behavioral health vulnerability.

Authors:  Jennifer D Wood; Laura Beierschmitt
Journal:  Int J Law Psychiatry       Date:  2014-03-13

5.  Communicating about Mental Illness and Violence: Balancing Stigma and Increased Support for Services.

Authors:  Emma E McGinty; Howard H Goldman; Bernice A Pescosolido; Colleen L Barry
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 2.265

6.  Barriers and facilitators to implementing an urban co-responding police-mental health team.

Authors:  Katie Bailey; Staci Rising Paquet; Bradley R Ray; Eric Grommon; Evan M Lowder; Emily Sightes
Journal:  Health Justice       Date:  2018-11-22

7.  Role of the police in linking individuals experiencing mental health crises with mental health services.

Authors:  Rob H S van den Brink; Jan Broer; Alfons J Tholen; Wim H Winthorst; Ellen Visser; Durk Wiersma
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.630

Review 8.  Interagency collaboration models for people with mental ill health in contact with the police: a systematic scoping review.

Authors:  Adwoa Parker; Arabella Scantlebury; Alison Booth; Jillian Catherine MacBryde; William J Scott; Kath Wright; Catriona McDaid
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.