Literature DB >> 17170939

Factors influencing hearing preservation in acoustic tumor surgery.

P Rastogi, A T Cacace, T J Lovely.   

Abstract

In patients who underwent neurosurgery for excision of acoustic tumors, we used correlation and multivariate logistic regression analysis to study relationships among nine variables thought to have value in predicting hearing preservation. These variables included auditory perceptual, auditory neurophysiologic, and imaging-related characteristics of acoustic tumor dimensions. The univariate correlations showed two general trends. The first trend demonstrated relationships among imaging-related acoustic tumor dimensions (size or porus acousticus widening) with either postoperative hearing or brainstem auditory evoked potential (BAEP) abnormalities (tumor size and postoperative hearing; porus acousticus widening and postoperative hearing; tumor size and preoperative BAEP abnormalities). The second trend reflected interrelationships among preoperative audiometric variables that were not related to postoperative hearing outcome. Logistic regression analysis of eight independent variables on the presence or absence of postoperative hearing found that porus acousticus widening was the best prognostic indicator for hearing outcome. When the porus acousticus was widened, the odds ratio was 11:1 that hearing would be lost postoperatively. Viewed as a whole, the literature on prognostic variables related to hearing preservation has been limited, almost entirely, to univariate relationships. To determine more accurately which preoperative variables have unique prognostic value, more complex multivariate, analysis procedures will be required. Additionally, standardized criteria for assessment and reporting of auditory test results are also needed.

Entities:  

Year:  1995        PMID: 17170939      PMCID: PMC1656496          DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1058927

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skull Base Surg        ISSN: 1052-1453


  20 in total

1.  Preservation of hearing in surgical removal of acoustic neuromas of the internal auditory canal and cerebellar pontine angle.

Authors:  J B Nadol; R Levine; R G Ojemann; R L Martuza; W W Montgomery; P K de Sandoval
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  The disconnected ear: phenomenological effects of a large acoustic tumor.

Authors:  A T Cacace; S M Parnes; T J Lovely; A Kalathia
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Technique of hearing preservation in small acoustic neuromas.

Authors:  P J Jannetta; A R Møller; M B Møller
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Hearing conservation in acoustic tumor surgery: pro's and con's.

Authors:  J D Clemis
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 3.497

5.  Acoustic tumor surgery. Prognostic factors in hearing conversation.

Authors:  C Shelton; D E Brackmann; W F House; W E Hitselberger
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1989-10

Review 6.  Hearing preservation in unilateral acoustic neuroma surgery.

Authors:  G Gardner; J H Robertson
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1988 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.547

7.  Preservation of hearing in patients undergoing excision of acoustic neuromas and other cerebellopontine angle tumors.

Authors:  C H Tator; J M Nedzelski
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  Hearing preservation after removal of acoustic neurinoma.

Authors:  S G Harner; E R Laws; B M Onofrio
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 9.  Management of seventh and eighth nerve involvement by cerebellopontine angle tumors.

Authors:  M Samii; K E Turel; G Penkert
Journal:  Clin Neurosurg       Date:  1985

10.  Hearing conservation surgery for acoustic tumors--a clinical-pathologic correlative study.

Authors:  J G Neely
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1985-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.