Literature DB >> 17170913

Intraoperative facial nerve monitoring in posterior fossa surgery: prognostic value.

C Berges, B Fraysse, E Yardeni, G Rugiu.   

Abstract

A retrospective study was done of 43 patients operated on for acoustic neuroma by a translabyrinthine approach with intraoperative facial nerve monitoring. Direct stimulation of the facial nerve at the level of the cerebellopontine angle (CPA) and the internal auditory canal (IAC) permits the calculation of a R ratio that has a predictive value for postoperative facial function: R = R'/R'', where R' is the ratio of the minimal intensity (I) of stimulation capable of inducing a response after direct stimulation of the facial nerve at the level of the CPA over the electromyographic response amplitude (A): R' = I(CPA)/A(CPA), R'' being equal to the ratio of these same measurements after stimulation at the IAC: R'' = I(IAC)/A(IAC). Statistical analysis has shown that an R ratio </= 2 has a favorable prognostic value on facial mobility whereas an R ratio > 2 permits the supposition of an alteration of facial function. This prognostic value is more precise if the R ratio is co-related to the macroscopic aspect of the facial nerve at the end of surgery.

Entities:  

Year:  1993        PMID: 17170913      PMCID: PMC1656456          DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1060589

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skull Base Surg        ISSN: 1052-1453


  9 in total

1.  Routine intraoperative facial nerve monitoring during otologic surgery.

Authors:  H Silverstein; E E Smouha; R Jones
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1988-07

2.  Acoustic (loudspeaker) facial electromyographic monitoring: Part 1. Evoked electromyographic activity during acoustic neuroma resection.

Authors:  R L Prass; H Lüders
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 4.654

3.  Facial nerve grading system.

Authors:  J W House; D E Brackmann
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 3.497

4.  Constant-current versus constant-voltage stimulation.

Authors:  R Prass; H Lüders
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Acoustic (loudspeaker) facial EMG monitoring: II. Use of evoked EMG activity during acoustic neuroma resection.

Authors:  R L Prass; S E Kinney; R W Hardy; J F Hahn; H Lüders
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 3.497

6.  Preservation of facial function during removal of acoustic neuromas. Use of monopolar constant-voltage stimulation and EMG.

Authors:  A R Møller; P J Jannetta
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Intraoperative facial nerve monitoring: a comparison of stimulating electrodes.

Authors:  J M Kartush; J K Niparko; S C Bledsoe; M D Graham; J L Kemink
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Intraoperative monitoring of facial nerve function in cerebellopontine angle surgery.

Authors:  P E Hammerschlag; N L Cohen
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.497

9.  Facial nerve preservation during surgery for removal of acoustic nerve tumors.

Authors:  R H Lye; J Dutton; R T Ramsden; J V Occleshaw; I T Ferguson; I Taylor
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 5.115

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.