Literature DB >> 17170145

No trade-off between biting and suction feeding performance in clariid catfishes.

Sam Van Wassenbergh1, Anthony Herrel, Dominique Adriaens, Peter Aerts.   

Abstract

It is generally assumed that biting performance trades off with suction performance in fish because both feeding types may place conflicting demands on the cranial musculo-skeletal system. However, the functional consequences of morphological adaptations enhancing biting on the mechanics and performance of suction feeding in fish remain obscure. In this study, suction feeding performance was compared between three clariid catfish species differing considerably in their biting capacity, by measuring the velocity of a standardized prey being sucked into the buccal cavity using high-speed cineradiography. In addition, buccal volume changes during prey capture were quantified by ellipse modelling. As all species were able to accelerate the prey to similar peak velocities, our results demonstrate the possibility for catfishes to increase bite performance considerably without compromising suction performance. The amount of buccal expansion in the ventral direction is approximately equal for all species. Consequently, the system generating expansion through ventral rotation of the lower jaw, hyoid and pectoral girdle is apparently not constrained (mechanically or architectonically) by the hypertrophy of the jaw adductors. As the effect of a reduced magnitude of lateral expansion (suspensorium abduction) on suction performance in Clariidae appears to be negligible (for example in Gymnallabes typus), these data demonstrate the dominant role of ventral expansion for producing suction in these fish.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17170145     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.02619

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  8 in total

Review 1.  Aquatic suction feeding dynamics: insights from computational modelling.

Authors:  Sam Van Wassenbergh; Peter Aerts
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Hydrodynamic Simulations of the Performance Landscape for Suction-Feeding Fishes Reveal Multiple Peaks for Different Prey Types.

Authors:  Karin H Olsson; Christopher H Martin; Roi Holzman
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 3.326

3.  A digital dissection of two teleost fishes: comparative functional anatomy of the cranial musculoskeletal system in pike (Esox lucius) and eel (Anguilla anguilla).

Authors:  Robert Brocklehurst; Laura Porro; Anthony Herrel; Dominique Adriaens; Emily Rayfield
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Dealing with food and eggs in mouthbrooding cichlids: structural and functional trade-offs in fitness related traits.

Authors:  Tim Tkint; Erik Verheyen; Barbara De Kegel; Philippe Helsen; Dominique Adriaens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Hydrodynamic performance of suction feeding is virtually unaffected by variation in the shape of the posterior region of the pharynx in fish.

Authors:  Pauline Provini; Sam Van Wassenbergh
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.963

6.  Finding the weakest link: mechanical sensitivity in a fish cranial linkage system.

Authors:  A Baumgart; P Anderson
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 2.963

7.  Suction feeding of West African lungfish (Protopterus annectens): An XROMM analysis of jaw mechanics, cranial kinesis, and hyoid mobility.

Authors:  Samantha M Gartner; Katrina R Whitlow; J D Laurence-Chasen; Elska B Kaczmarek; Michael C Granatosky; Callum F Ross; Mark W Westneat
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 2.643

8.  Biomechanics and hydrodynamics of prey capture in the Chinese giant salamander reveal a high-performance jaw-powered suction feeding mechanism.

Authors:  Egon Heiss; Nikolay Natchev; Michaela Gumpenberger; Anton Weissenbacher; Sam Van Wassenbergh
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 4.118

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.