Literature DB >> 17169589

Biomechanical evaluation of subscapularis repair used during shoulder arthroplasty.

Christopher S Ahmad1, David Wing, Thomas R Gardner, William N Levine, Louis U Bigliani.   

Abstract

Dysfunction of the subscapularis after total shoulder replacement has become concerning and may represent poor tendon healing after surgical repair. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the restoration of subscapularis footprint anatomy and failure strength for subscapularis repair via transosseous tunnels and a second anatomic repair via combined transosseous tunnels and direct tendon-to-tendon repair. Six matched pairs of fresh-frozen human cadaveric shoulders were used, with one shoulder from each pair randomly assigned to a transosseous repair and the contralateral shoulder assigned to a combined transosseous tunnel and direct tendon-to-tendon repair. The repair footprint was digitized. Cyclic loading to the tendon repair was performed followed by a constant ramp displacement to complete failure. The transosseous tunnel repair insertional footprint area (228.6 mm2) was significantly less than that of the native footprint (697.3 mm2), and the footprint centroid moved 9.1 mm medially (P = .0001) and 5.5 mm superiorly (P = .003). The combined repair required a statistically significantly greater number of cycles (P = .028) to reach a 5-mm gap (205.7 +/- 65.1) than did the isolated transosseous tunnel technique (76.4 +/- 34.2). A similar greater number of cycles was observed for the 10-mm gap (P = .01) for combined repair (307.5 +/- 82.4) compared with isolated transosseous repair (166.2 +/- 85.8). This study has shown that transosseous tunnel repair alters subscapularis insertional anatomy, resulting in weaker strength of fixation and less contact area when compared with combined transosseous tunnel and direct tendon-to-tendon repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17169589     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2006.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  11 in total

1.  Reconstruction of 25 and 50 % subscapularis tears: a single anchor with a double-mattress suture is sufficient for the reconstruction.

Authors:  Olaf Lorbach; Christian Trennheuser; Matthias Kieb; Turgay Efe; Dieter Kohn; Konstantinos Anagnostakos
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Biomechanical evaluation of a single-row versus double-row repair for complete subscapularis tears.

Authors:  Mathias Wellmann; Philipp Wiebringhaus; Ina Lodde; Hazibullah Waizy; Christoph Becher; Michael J Raschke; Wolf Petersen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Histologic stages of healing correlate with restoration of tensile strength in a model of experimental tendon repair.

Authors:  Andrew J Rosenbaum; Jordan F Wicker; Joshua S Dines; Lawrence Bonasser; Pasquale Razzano; David M Dines; Daniel A Grande
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2010-02-02

Review 4.  How should I fixate the subscapularis in total shoulder arthroplasty? A systematic review of pertinent subscapularis repair biomechanics.

Authors:  John B Schrock; Matthew J Kraeutler; Charles T Crellin; Eric C McCarty; Jonathan T Bravman
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2017-04-05

5.  Deltopectoral approach for shoulder arthroplasty: anatomic basis.

Authors:  Francois Gadea; Yves Bouju; Julien Berhouet; Guillaume Bacle; Luc Favard
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Are Knotted or Knotless Techniques Better for Reconstruction of Full-Thickness Tears of the Superior Portion of the Subscapularis Tendon? A Study in Cadavers.

Authors:  Mirco Sgroi; Thomas Kappe; Marius Ludwig; Michael Fuchs; Daniel Dornacher; Heiko Reichel; Anita Ignatius; Lutz Dürselen; Anne Seywald; Andreas Martin Seitz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 4.755

Review 7.  Biomechanical Comparison of Single- Versus Double-Row Capsulolabral Repair for Shoulder Instability: A Review.

Authors:  Matthew John Yousif; James Bicos
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-12-04

8.  Biomechanical comparison of subscapularis peel and lesser tuberosity osteotomy for double-row subscapularis repair technique in a cadaveric arthroplasty model.

Authors:  Mandeep S Virk; Saleh S Aiyash; Rachel M Frank; Christopher S Mellano; Elizabeth F Shewman; Vincent M Wang; Anthony A Romeo
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  A biomechanical comparison of subscapularis repair techniques in total shoulder arthroplasty: lesser tuberosity osteotomy versus subscapularis peel.

Authors:  Morenikeji Ayodele Buraimoh; Kelechi R Okoroha; Daniel J Oravec; Cathryn D Peltz; Yener N Yeni; Stephanie J Muh
Journal:  JSES Open Access       Date:  2018-02-01

10.  Subscapularis integrity, function and EMG/nerve conduction study findings following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael Khazzam; Bryan Reyes; Amy Phelan; Stephen Gates
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-05-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.