Literature DB >> 17168036

Assessing tiger population dynamics using photographic capture-recapture sampling.

K Ullas Karanth1, James D Nichols, N Samba Kumar, James E Hines.   

Abstract

Although wide-ranging, elusive, large carnivore species, such as the tiger, are of scientific and conservation interest, rigorous inferences about their population dynamics are scarce because of methodological problems of sampling populations at the required spatial and temporal scales. We report the application of a rigorous, noninvasive method for assessing tiger population dynamics to test model-based predictions about population viability. We obtained photographic capture histories for 74 individual tigers during a nine-year study involving 5725 trap-nights of effort. These data were modeled under a likelihood-based, "robust design" capture-recapture analytic framework. We explicitly modeled and estimated ecological parameters such as time-specific abundance, density, survival, recruitment, temporary emigration, and transience, using models that incorporated effects of factors such as individual heterogeneity, trap-response, and time on probabilities of photo-capturing tigers. The model estimated a random temporary emigration parameter of gamma" = gamma' = 0.10 +/- 0.069 (values are estimated mean +/- SE). When scaled to an annual basis, tiger survival rates were estimated at S = 0.77 +/- 0.051, and the estimated probability that a newly caught animal was a transient was tau = 0.18 +/- 0.11. During the period when the sampled area was of constant size, the estimated population size N(t) varied from 17 +/- 1.7 to 31 +/- 2.1 tigers, with a geometric mean rate of annual population change estimated as lambda = 1.03 +/- 0.020, representing a 3% annual increase. The estimated recruitment of new animals, B(t), varied from 0 +/- 3.0 to 14 +/- 2.9 tigers. Population density estimates, D, ranged from 7.33 +/- 0.8 tigers/100 km2 to 21.73 +/- 1.7 tigers/100 km2 during the study. Thus, despite substantial annual losses and temporal variation in recruitment, the tiger density remained at relatively high levels in Nagarahole. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that protected wild tiger populations can remain healthy despite heavy mortalities because of their inherently high reproductive potential. The ability to model the entire photographic capture history data set and incorporate reduced-parameter models led to estimates of mean annual population change that were sufficiently precise to be useful. This efficient, noninvasive sampling approach can be used to rigorously investigate the population dynamics of tigers and other elusive, rare, wide-ranging animal species in which individuals can be identified from photographs or other means.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17168036     DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2925:atpdup]2.0.co;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  39 in total

1.  Spatio-temporal interactions facilitate large carnivore sympatry across a resource gradient.

Authors:  K Ullas Karanth; Arjun Srivathsa; Divya Vasudev; Mahi Puri; Ravishankar Parameshwaran; N Samba Kumar
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Bringing the tiger back from the brink-the six percent solution.

Authors:  Joe Walston; John G Robinson; Elizabeth L Bennett; Urs Breitenmoser; Gustavo A B da Fonseca; John Goodrich; Melvin Gumal; Luke Hunter; Arlyne Johnson; K Ullas Karanth; Nigel Leader-Williams; Kathy Mackinnon; Dale Miquelle; Anak Pattanavibool; Colin Poole; Alan Rabinowitz; James L D Smith; Emma J Stokes; Simon N Stuart; Chanthavy Vongkhamheng; Hariyo Wibisono
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 8.029

3.  A tiger cannot change its stripes: using a three-dimensional model to match images of living tigers and tiger skins.

Authors:  Lex Hiby; Phil Lovell; Narendra Patil; N Samba Kumar; Arjun M Gopalaswamy; K Ullas Karanth
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Breaking down population density into different components to better understand its spatial variation.

Authors:  Sébastien Devillard; Sandrine Ruette; Mickaël Jacquier; Jean-Michel Vandel; François Léger; Jeanne Duhayer; Sylvia Pardonnet; Ludovic Say
Journal:  BMC Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-11

5.  Photographic capture-recapture sampling for assessing populations of the Indian gliding lizard Draco dussumieri.

Authors:  Rachakonda Sreekar; Chetana B Purushotham; Katya Saini; Shyam N Rao; Simon Pelletier; Saniya Chaplod
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Genetic evidence of tiger population structure and migration within an isolated and fragmented landscape in Northwest India.

Authors:  Patlolla Anuradha Reddy; Digpal Singh Gour; Maradani Bhavanishankar; Kanika Jaggi; Shaik Mohammed Hussain; Katakam Harika; Sisinthy Shivaji
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Why the Indian subcontinent holds the key to global tiger recovery.

Authors:  Samrat Mondol; K Ullas Karanth; Uma Ramakrishnan
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  Testing the precision and sensitivity of density estimates obtained with a camera-trap method revealed limitations and opportunities.

Authors:  Pascal Pettigrew; Daniel Sigouin; Martin-Hugues St-Laurent
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Big cats in our backyards: persistence of large carnivores in a human dominated landscape in India.

Authors:  Vidya Athreya; Morten Odden; John D C Linnell; Jagdish Krishnaswamy; Ullas Karanth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Face Value: Towards Robust Estimates of Snow Leopard Densities.

Authors:  Justine S Alexander; Arjun M Gopalaswamy; Kun Shi; Philip Riordan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.