Literature DB >> 17167989

Absolute conductivity reconstruction in magnetic induction tomography using a nonlinear method.

Manuchehr Soleimani1, William R B Lionheart.   

Abstract

Magnetic induction tomography (MIT) attempts to image the electrical and magnetic characteristics of a target using impedance measurement data from pairs of excitation and detection coils. This inverse eddy current problem is nonlinear and also severely ill posed so regularization is required for a stable solution. A regularized Gauss-Newton algorithm has been implemented as a nonlinear, iterative inverse solver. In this algorithm, one needs to solve the forward problem and recalculate the Jacobian matrix for each iteration. The forward problem has been solved using an edge based finite element method for magnetic vector potential A and electrical scalar potential V, a so called A, A - V formulation. A theoretical study of the general inverse eddy current problem and a derivation, paying special attention to the boundary conditions, of an adjoint field formula for the Jacobian is given. This efficient formula calculates the change in measured induced voltage due to a small perturbation of the conductivity in a region. This has the advantage that it involves only the inner product of the electric fields when two different coils are excited, and these are convenient computationally. This paper also shows that the sensitivity maps change significantly when the conductivity distribution changes, demonstrating the necessity for a nonlinear reconstruction algorithm. The performance of the inverse solver has been examined and results presented from simulated data with added noise.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17167989     DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2006.884196

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging        ISSN: 0278-0062            Impact factor:   10.048


  7 in total

1.  Fourier-based magnetic induction tomography for mapping resistivity.

Authors:  Steffan Puwal; Bradley J Roth
Journal:  J Appl Phys       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  Fourier analysis in Magnetic Induction Tomography: Mapping of anisotropic, inhomogeneous resistivity.

Authors:  Steffan Puwal; Bradley J Roth
Journal:  Meas Sci Technol       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 2.046

3.  Forward modelling of magnetic induction tomography: a sensitivity study for detecting haemorrhagic cerebral stroke.

Authors:  M Zolgharni; P D Ledger; H Griffiths
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 4.  Advancements in transmitters and sensors for biological tissue imaging in magnetic induction tomography.

Authors:  Zulkarnay Zakaria; Ruzairi Abdul Rahim; Muhammad Saiful Badri Mansor; Sazali Yaacob; Nor Muzakkir Nor Ayub; Siti Zarina Mohd Muji; Mohd Hafiz Fazalul Rahiman; Syed Mustafa Kamal Syed Aman
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Volumetric electromagnetic phase-shift spectroscopy of brain edema and hematoma.

Authors:  Cesar A Gonzalez; Jose A Valencia; Alfredo Mora; Fernando Gonzalez; Beatriz Velasco; Martin A Porras; Javier Salgado; Salvador M Polo; Nidiyare Hevia-Montiel; Sergio Cordero; Boris Rubinsky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Translational-circular scanning for magneto-acoustic tomography with current injection.

Authors:  Shigang Wang; Ren Ma; Shunqi Zhang; Tao Yin; Zhipeng Liu
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 2.819

Review 7.  A Review on Fast Tomographic Imaging Techniques and Their Potential Application in Industrial Process Control.

Authors:  Uwe Hampel; Laurent Babout; Robert Banasiak; Eckhard Schleicher; Manuchehr Soleimani; Thomas Wondrak; Marko Vauhkonen; Timo Lähivaara; Chao Tan; Brian Hoyle; Alexander Penn
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.576

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.