BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that lower extremity muscle power is more important for physical function in older adults compared to strength, and that there is a nonlinear relationship between power or strength and physical function that might be indicative of a threshold above which the association between muscle function and physical function is no longer evident. This study examined the association between lower extremity strength or power with the time to complete a 400-meter walk, and attempted to identify thresholds within the relationship. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis of a sample of 384 females and 336 males aged > or = 65 years from the InCHIANTI study ("Invecchiare in Chianti," i.e., Aging in the Chianti Area) was conducted. Measures included 400-meter walk time, lower extremity strength and power, comorbidities, and sociodemographic variables (age, gender, height, education, cognitive function, depression). RESULTS: Linear regression models showed that both lower extremity strength and power were significant predictors of 400-meter walk time, although power explained marginally more of the variance in 400-meter walk time. Quadratic models of lower extremity strength and power fit the data slightly better than the linear models. Regardless of gender, comorbidities, or normalization scheme for strength and power, the curvilinear form of the relationship between strength or power and 400-meter walk time remained the same. CONCLUSIONS: Lower extremity muscle strength and power are both important predictors of the 400-meter walk time. Although curvilinear relationships existed between muscle strength and power and the 400-meter walk time, the data do not indicate a clear threshold for either strength or power above which the performance in the 400-meter walk test plateaus.
BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that lower extremity muscle power is more important for physical function in older adults compared to strength, and that there is a nonlinear relationship between power or strength and physical function that might be indicative of a threshold above which the association between muscle function and physical function is no longer evident. This study examined the association between lower extremity strength or power with the time to complete a 400-meter walk, and attempted to identify thresholds within the relationship. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis of a sample of 384 females and 336 males aged > or = 65 years from the InCHIANTI study ("Invecchiare in Chianti," i.e., Aging in the Chianti Area) was conducted. Measures included 400-meter walk time, lower extremity strength and power, comorbidities, and sociodemographic variables (age, gender, height, education, cognitive function, depression). RESULTS: Linear regression models showed that both lower extremity strength and power were significant predictors of 400-meter walk time, although power explained marginally more of the variance in 400-meter walk time. Quadratic models of lower extremity strength and power fit the data slightly better than the linear models. Regardless of gender, comorbidities, or normalization scheme for strength and power, the curvilinear form of the relationship between strength or power and 400-meter walk time remained the same. CONCLUSIONS: Lower extremity muscle strength and power are both important predictors of the 400-meter walk time. Although curvilinear relationships existed between muscle strength and power and the 400-meter walk time, the data do not indicate a clear threshold for either strength or power above which the performance in the 400-meter walk test plateaus.
Authors: Lori L Ploutz-Snyder; Todd Manini; Robert J Ploutz-Snyder; Douglas A Wolf Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Jonathan F Bean; Dan K Kiely; Suzanne G Leveille; Seth Herman; Charlie Huynh; Roger Fielding; Walter Frontera Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: M Foldvari; M Clark; L C Laviolette; M A Bernstein; D Kaliton; C Castaneda; C T Pu; J M Hausdorff; R A Fielding; M A Singh Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: L Ferrucci; S Bandinelli; E Benvenuti; A Di Iorio; C Macchi; T B Harris; J M Guralnik Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2000-12 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Jonathan F Bean; Dan K Kiely; Seth Herman; Suzanne G Leveille; Kelly Mizer; Walter R Frontera; Roger A Fielding Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Francesco Pizzarelli; Fulvio Lauretani; Stefania Bandinelli; Gwen B Windham; Anna Maria Corsi; Sandra V Giannelli; Luigi Ferrucci; Jack M Guralnik Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2008-11-06 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Fulvio Lauretani; Richard D Semba; Stefania Bandinelli; Margaret Dayhoff-Brannigan; Vittoria Giacomini; Anna Maria Corsi; Jack M Guralnik; Luigi Ferrucci Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Marla K Beauchamp; Suzanne G Leveille; Kushang V Patel; Dan K Kiely; Caroline L Phillips; Stefania Bandinelli; Luigi Ferrucci; Jack Guralnik; Jonathan F Bean Journal: Am J Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 2.159
Authors: C Annweiler; O Beauchet; G Berrut; B Fantino; M Bonnefoy; F R Herrmann; A M Schott Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: David X Marquez; JoEllen Wilbur; Susan L Hughes; Michael L Berbaum; Robert S Wilson; David M Buchner; Edward McAuley Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2014-06-24 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Anthony P Marsh; Michael E Miller; W Jack Rejeski; Stacy L Hutton; Stephen B Kritchevsky Journal: J Aging Phys Act Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 1.961