Literature DB >> 17166915

Comparative analysis of Hox downstream genes in Drosophila.

Stefanie D Hueber1, Daniela Bezdan, Stefan R Henz, Martina Blank, Haijia Wu, Ingrid Lohmann.   

Abstract

Functional diversification of body parts is dependent on the formation of specialized structures along the various body axes. In animals, region-specific morphogenesis along the anteroposterior axis is controlled by a group of conserved transcription factors encoded by the Hox genes. Although it has long been assumed that Hox proteins carry out their function by regulating distinct sets of downstream genes, only a small number of such genes have been found, with very few having direct roles in controlling cellular behavior. We have quantitatively identified hundreds of Hox downstream genes in Drosophila by microarray analysis, and validated many of them by in situ hybridizations on loss- and gain-of-function mutants. One important finding is that Hox proteins, despite their similar DNA-binding properties in vitro, have highly specific effects on the transcriptome in vivo, because expression of many downstream genes respond primarily to a single Hox protein. In addition, a large fraction of downstream genes encodes realizator functions, which directly affect morphogenetic processes, such as orientation and rate of cell divisions, cell-cell adhesion and communication, cell shape and migration, or cell death. Focusing on these realizators, we provide a framework for the morphogenesis of the maxillary segment. As the genomic organization of Hox genes and the interaction of Hox proteins with specific co-factors are conserved in vertebrates and invertebrates, and similar classes of downstream genes are regulated by Hox proteins across the metazoan phylogeny, our findings represent a first step toward a mechanistic understanding of morphological diversification within a species as well as between species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17166915     DOI: 10.1242/dev.02746

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Development        ISSN: 0950-1991            Impact factor:   6.868


  43 in total

1.  Developmental competence and the induction of ectopic proboscises in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Anthony Percival-Smith; Lovesha Sivanantharajah; Jacob J H Pelling; Wendy A Teft
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 0.900

2.  Roles of Hox genes in the patterning of the central nervous system of Drosophila.

Authors:  Alicia Estacio-Gómez; Fernando J Díaz-Benjumea
Journal:  Fly (Austin)       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 2.160

3.  The cis-regulatory logic underlying abdominal Hox-mediated repression versus activation of regulatory elements in Drosophila.

Authors:  Arya Zandvakili; Juli D Uhl; Ian Campbell; Joseph Salomone; Yuntao Charlie Song; Brian Gebelein
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 3.582

4.  Interpreting the regulatory genome: the genomics of transcription factor function in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Matthew Slattery; Nicolas Nègre; Kevin P White
Journal:  Brief Funct Genomics       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Comparing anterior and posterior Hox complex formation reveals guidelines for predicting cis-regulatory elements.

Authors:  Juli D Uhl; Tiffany A Cook; Brian Gebelein
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 3.582

6.  Non-specificity of transcription factor function in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Anthony Percival-Smith
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 0.900

7.  Improving Hox protein classification across the major model organisms.

Authors:  Stefanie D Hueber; Georg F Weiller; Michael A Djordjevic; Tancred Frickey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  To Be Specific or Not: The Critical Relationship Between Hox And TALE Proteins.

Authors:  Samir Merabet; Richard S Mann
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 11.639

9.  DNA methylation is crucial for the early development in the Oyster C. gigas.

Authors:  Guillaume Riviere; Guan-Chung Wu; Alexandre Fellous; Didier Goux; Pascal Sourdaine; Pascal Favrel
Journal:  Mar Biotechnol (NY)       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.619

10.  Rhombomere-specific analysis reveals the repertoire of genetic cues expressed across the developing hindbrain.

Authors:  David Chambers; Leigh Jane Wilson; Fabienne Alfonsi; Ewan Hunter; Uma Saxena; Eric Blanc; Andrew Lumsden
Journal:  Neural Dev       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 3.842

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.