Literature DB >> 17166589

An empirical investigation of insanity defense attitudes: exploring factors related to bias.

Angela L Bloechl1, Michael J Vitacco, Craig S Neumann, Steven E Erickson.   

Abstract

This study's primary aim was to evaluate factors that influence attitudes toward the insanity defense in a sample of 578 college undergraduates. In addition to a comprehensive demographics survey, participants completed the Insanity Defense Attitude Scale-Revised (IDAS-R) and the Attitude Toward the Death Penalty (ATDP) Scale. Favorable attitude toward capital punishment and misperceptions about overuse of the insanity defense were related to negative attitudes toward the insanity defense. Hierarchical regression analyses demonstrated that possessing a favorable attitude toward capital punishment was the most robust predictor of a negative attitude toward the insanity defense. These findings provide valuable information about factors that create and maintain biases against the insanity defense and suggest areas of inquiry that could aid attorneys in selecting unbiased jurors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17166589     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2006.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Law Psychiatry        ISSN: 0160-2527


  4 in total

1.  Neuroscience, ethics and legal responsibility: the problem of the insanity defense. Commentary on "The ethics of neuroscience and the neuroscience of ethics: a phenomenological-existential approach".

Authors:  Steven R Smith
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2012-09-29       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Criminal Responsibility Scale: Development and Validation of a Psychometric Tool Structured in Clinical Vignettes for Criminal Responsibility Assessments in Brazil.

Authors:  Leonardo Fernandez Meyer; Cláudia Cristina Studart Leal; Alexandre de Almeida Souza Omena; Katia Mecler; Alexandre Martins Valença
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 4.157

3.  What's in the Box? Punishment and Insanity in the Canadian Jury Deliberation Room.

Authors:  Susan Yamamoto; Evelyn M Maeder
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-06-30

4.  Not a "Get Out of Jail Free Card": Comparing the Legal Supervision of Persons Found Not Criminally Responsible on Account of Mental Disorder and Convicted Offenders.

Authors:  Sandrine Martin; Yanick Charette; Chloé Leclerc; Michael C Seto; Tonia L Nicholls; Anne G Crocker
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 4.157

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.