Literature DB >> 17165636

Elimination of the need for urine studies in the screening algorithm for monoclonal gammopathies by using serum immunofixation and free light chain assays.

Jerry A Katzmann1, Angela Dispenzieri, Robert A Kyle, Melissa R Snyder, Matthew F Plevak, Dirk R Larson, Roshini S Abraham, John A Lust, L Joseph Melton, S Vincent Rajkumar.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative diagnostic contribution of urine assays as part of the screening algorithm for monoclonal gammopathies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified 428 patients with a monoclonal gammopathy and monoclonal urinary protein at initial diagnosis of plasma cell dyscrasia who had also undergone serum immunofixation and serum free light chain quantitation within 30 days of diagnosis. The laboratory results for serum protein electrophoresis, serum immunofixation, serum free light chain, urine protein electrophoresis, and urine immunofixation were reviewed.
RESULTS: The patients had diagnoses of multiple myeloma, primary amyloid, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, smoldering multiple myeloma, solitary plasmacytomas, and other less frequently detected monoclonal gammopathies. All 428 had a monoclonal urine protein, 85.7% had an abnormal serum free light chain kappa/lambda ratio, 80.8% had an abnormal serum protein electrophoresis, and 93.5% had an abnormal serum immunofixation result. All 3 serum assays were normal in only 2 patients, 1 of whom had monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (idiopathic Bence Jones proteinuria) and 1 whose urine sample contained an intact monoclonal immunoglobulin but whose serum and subsequent urine samples showed no evidence of a monoclonal gammopathy.
CONCLUSION: Discontinuation of urine studies and reliance on a diagnostic algorithm using only serum studies (protein electrophoresis, immunofixation, and free light chain quantitation) missed 2 (0.5%) of the 428 monoclonal gammopathies with urinary monoclonal proteins, and these 2 cases required no medical intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17165636     DOI: 10.4065/81.12.1575

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc        ISSN: 0025-6196            Impact factor:   7.616


  38 in total

Review 1.  Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and smoldering multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Robert A Kyle; S Vincent Rajkumar
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 2.  Multiple myeloma.

Authors:  S Vincent Rajkumar
Journal:  Curr Probl Cancer       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.187

Review 3.  Advances in understanding monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance as a precursor of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Brendan M Weiss; W Michael Kuehl
Journal:  Expert Rev Hematol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.929

4.  Prevalence and risk of progression of light-chain monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: a retrospective population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Angela Dispenzieri; Jerry A Katzmann; Robert A Kyle; Dirk R Larson; L Joseph Melton; Colin L Colby; Terry M Therneau; Raynell Clark; Shaji K Kumar; Arthur Bradwell; Rafael Fonseca; D F Jelinek; S Vincent Rajkumar
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Multiple myeloma: 2018 update on diagnosis, risk‐stratification, and management

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 10.047

Review 6.  Serum free light chain assessment in monoclonal gammopathy and kidney disease.

Authors:  Colin A Hutchison; Kolitha Basnayake; Paul Cockwell
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 28.314

7.  Screening panels for monoclonal gammopathies: time to change.

Authors:  Jerry A Katzmann
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2009-08

Review 8.  Management of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM).

Authors:  Robert A Kyle; S Vincent Rajkumar
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.990

Review 9.  Minimal residual disease testing after stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma.

Authors:  A M Sherrod; P Hari; C A Mosse; R C Walker; R F Cornell
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 10.  Diagnostic Advances in Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Kevin Barley; Ajai Chari
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.