Literature DB >> 17164544

What is the difference between proximal and total gastrectomy regarding postoperative bile reflux into the oesophagus?

I E Katsoulis1, J F Robotis, G Kouraklis, P A Yannopoulos.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tumours of the oesophagogastric junction and the gastric cardia can be treated either with proximal or with total gastrectomy. Reflux of bile and other duodenal contents into the oesophagus following proximal gastrectomy has generally been considered worse than reflux after total gastrectomy. The aim of the present study was to test this assumption given that there is limited literature regarding objective evaluation of the postoperative duodeno-oesophageal reflux. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We carried out bilirubin monitoring with the ambulatory spectrophotometer Bilitec 2000 in two groups of patients and in one group of healthy volunteers matched in age and sex. The proximal gastrectomy group consisted of 8 patients who underwent proximal gastrectomy and an end-to-side oesophagogastrostomy without pyloric drainage procedure. The total gastrectomy group consisted of 11 patients who underwent total gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y reconstruction with a 50-cm-long jejunal limb. The control group consisted of 8 healthy volunteers. In all cases, an absorption value of 0.14 was used as the threshold for reflux episodes.
RESULTS: The median fraction of time that bilirubin absorbance was >0.14 in the proximal versus total gastrectomy group was 47.4 and 13.4%, respectively (p = 0.02). The difference between the two groups was significant in the supine position (p = 0.03), whilst the upright position, meal and postprandial periods were not found to have significant difference. Likewise, no significant difference was found in the number of reflux episodes. The median fraction of time in the proximal gastrectomy group compared with controls was 47.4 versus 3.95% (p < 0.001), whilst in the total gastrectomy group compared with controls, it was 13.4 versus 3.95% (p > 0.05). The number of reflux episodes in the proximal gastrectomy group compared with controls was 74 versus 21 (p = 0.02), whilst in the total gastrectomy group compared with controls, it was 103 versus 21 (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction reduces the time of oesophageal exposure to duodenal juices as compared with proximal gastrectomy. This effect seems to be more prominent in the supine position. Copyright 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17164544     DOI: 10.1159/000097948

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Surg        ISSN: 0253-4886            Impact factor:   2.588


  16 in total

1.  Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with oblique jejunogastrostomy.

Authors:  Kimitaka Tanaka; Yuma Ebihara; Yo Kurashima; Yoshitsugu Nakanishi; Toshimichi Asano; Takehiro Noji; Soichi Murakami; Toru Nakamura; Takahiro Tsuchikawa; Keisuke Okamura; Toshiaki Shichinohe; Satoshi Hirano
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Should Pyloric Lymph Nodes Be Dissected for Siewert Type II and III Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junctions: Experience from a High-Volume Center in China.

Authors:  Huihua Cao; Marie Ooi; Zhan Yu; Qing Wang; Zhong Li; Qicheng Lu; Yugang Wu
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Laparoscopy-assisted resection of proximal gastric cancer: is less than all more or less complete, or is all more, nonetheless?

Authors:  Roderich E Schwarz; Changhua Zhang; John C Mansour
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 7.370

4.  Comparative study of clinical outcomes between laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy (LAPG) and laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) for proximal gastric cancer.

Authors:  Sang-Hoon Ahn; Ju Hee Lee; Do Joong Park; Hyung-Ho Kim
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2012-07-22       Impact factor: 7.370

5.  Total vs proximal gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma of the upper third of the stomach: a propensity-score-matched analysis of a multicenter western experience (On behalf of the Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer-GIRCG).

Authors:  Fausto Rosa; Giuseppe Quero; Claudio Fiorillo; Massimiliano Bissolati; Chiara Cipollari; Stefano Rausei; Damiano Chiari; Laura Ruspi; Giovanni de Manzoni; Guido Costamagna; Giovanni Battista Doglietto; Sergio Alfieri
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 7.370

6.  Significance of the lower esophageal sphincter preservation in preventing alkaline reflux esophagitis in patients after total gastrectomy reconstructed by Roux-en-Y for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Ryouichi Tomita; Kenichi Sakurai; Shigeru Fujisaki
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr

7.  Clinical outcome of lower esophageal sphincter- and vagus-nerve-preserving partial cardiectomy for early gastric cancer of the subcardia.

Authors:  Hideo Matsumoto; Haruaki Murakami; Hisako Kubota; Masaharu Higashida; Masafumi Nakamura; Toshihiro Hirai
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 7.370

8.  Long-term outcome after proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition for gastric cancer compared with total gastrectomy.

Authors:  Isao Nozaki; Shinji Hato; Takaya Kobatake; Koji Ohta; Yoshirou Kubo; Akira Kurita
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Comparative study on three types of alimentary reconstruction after total gastrectomy.

Authors:  Hong-Bo Wei; Bo Wei; Zong-Heng Zheng; Feng Zheng; Wan-Shou Qiu; Wei-Ping Guo; Tian-Bao Wang; Jie Xu; Tu-Feng Chen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Gastric liposarcoma in a patient with severe obesity.

Authors:  A Girardot-Miglierina; D Clerc; M Suter
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 1.891

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.