Literature DB >> 17164356

Toxicant exposure in cigarette reducers versus light smokers.

Dorothy K Hatsukami1, Chap T Le, Ying Zhang, Anne M Joseph, Marc E Mooney, Steven G Carmella, Stephen S Hecht.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The extent of exposure to tobacco toxicants in smokers who have reduced their cigarette intake compared with smokers who are light smokers is relatively unknown. The goal of this study is to investigate the occurrence of compensatory smoking in reducers compared with light smokers by measuring toxicant exposure.
METHODS: Participants in two smoking reduction intervention studies (N = 64) were selected for comparison with a group of light smokers (N = 62) who smoked the same number of cigarettes as the reducers. A compensatory smoking score was defined (biomarker level for reducer/biomarker level for light smoker) and calculated for urinary 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol (NNAL) and its glucuronides (total NNAL), metabolites of the tobacco-specific lung carcinogen 4-(methylnitrosamino)-I-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone, to measure the degree of smoking compensation in reducers when compared with the light smokers.
RESULTS: The mean level of creatinine-adjusted total NNAL for reducers was over twice that of light smokers even when they smoked about the same number of cigarettes per day. The difference of the mean total NNAL concentrations between light smokers and reducers was highly significant (P < 0.0001). Wide variability in total NNAL concentrations was also observed in reducers, with the extent of this variability between light smokers and reducers being significantly different (P = 0.0005). The level of individual reduction was shown to be a consistent predictor of compensatory smoking (r = 0.50; adjusted Ps = 0.002), with greater cigarette reduction associated with more compensation.
CONCLUSIONS: Compensatory smoking limits the harm reduction value of decreased smoking of cigarettes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17164356      PMCID: PMC6512339          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  20 in total

1.  Social influences on smoking in middle-aged and older women.

Authors:  Charles J Holahan; Rebecca J North; Carole K Holahan; Rashelle B Hayes; Daniel A Powers; Judith K Ockene
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2011-10-17

2.  A lack of association between severity of nicotine withdrawal and individual differences in compensatory nicotine self-administration in rats.

Authors:  Andrew C Harris; Paul R Pentel; Danielle Burroughs; Mylissa D Staley; Mark G Lesage
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  How should we define light or intermittent smoking? Does it matter?

Authors:  Corinne G Husten
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 4.244

4.  Biomarkers of Tobacco Exposure: Summary of an FDA-Sponsored Public Workshop.

Authors:  Cindy M Chang; Selvin H Edwards; Aarthi Arab; Arseima Y Del Valle-Pinero; Ling Yang; Dorothy K Hatsukami
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 5.  Personalized periodontal treatment for the tobacco- and alcohol-using patient.

Authors:  Mark I Ryder; Elizabeth T Couch; Benjamin W Chaffee
Journal:  Periodontol 2000       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 7.589

6.  Tobacco use by male prisoners under an indoor smoking ban.

Authors:  Ross M Kauffman; Amy K Ferketich; David M Murray; Paul E Bellair; Mary Ellen Wewers
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 4.244

7.  Smoking status, physical health-related quality of life, and mortality in middle-aged and older women.

Authors:  Carole K Holahan; Charles J Holahan; Rebecca J North; Rashelle B Hayes; Daniel A Powers; Judith K Ockene
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 8.  Developing the science base for reducing tobacco harm.

Authors:  Dorothy K Hatsukami; Anne M Joseph; Mark Lesage; Joni Jensen; Sharon E Murphy; Paul R Pentel; Michael Kotlyar; Eugene Borgida; Chap Le; Stephen S Hecht
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.244

9.  Correlates of individual differences in compensatory nicotine self-administration in rats following a decrease in nicotine unit dose.

Authors:  Andrew C Harris; Paul R Pentel; Mark G LeSage
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  A prospectively measured serum biomarker for a tobacco-specific carcinogen and lung cancer in smokers.

Authors:  Timothy R Church; Kristin E Anderson; Neil E Caporaso; Mindy S Geisser; Chap T Le; Yan Zhang; Adam R Benoit; Steven G Carmella; Stephen S Hecht
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.