Yoshitaka Fujii1, Yuka Shiga. 1. Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Tsukuba Institute of Clinical Medicine, Tsukuba City, Ibaraki, Japan. yfujii@med.toho-u.ac.jp
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Pain on injection is still a major problem with propofol; metoclopramide effectively decreases this pain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of aging on metoclopramide requirement for propofol-induced pain. METHODS: In a randomised, double-blind manner, 120 patients, 60 younger (aged 20-40 years) and 60 older (aged 60-80 years) adults, receivedplacebo (saline) or metoclopramide intravenously at two different doses (2.5mg and 5 mg) [younger group n = 20 each, older group n = 20 each], with venous occlusion for 1 minute, followed by administration of propofol 0.5 mg/kg into a dorsal hand vein. A blinded researcher asked the patient to assess the pain according to a pain score (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe) during injection of propofol. RESULTS: For younger patients, the incidence of propofol-induced pain was 30% in patients receiving metoclopramide 5mg (both p < 0.05), 70% in those receiving metoclopramide 2.5mg and 80% in those receiving placebo. The median pain score was lower in patients receiving metoclopramide 5mg (0) than in those receiving placebo (1.5) [p < 0.05]. For older patients, 15 patients (75%) complained of pain in the placebo group, compared with six (30%) in the metoclopramide 5mg group (p < 0.01) and seven (35%) in the metoclopramide 2.5mg group (p < 0.05). The median pain score was lower in patients receiving metoclopramide 5mg (0) [p < 0.01] or metoclopramide 2.5mg (0) [p < 0.05] than in those receiving placebo (1). CONCLUSION: This study showed that older patients require lessmetoclopramide, with venous occlusion for 1 minute, to reduce pain on injection of propofol than do younger patients.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE:Pain on injection is still a major problem with propofol; metoclopramide effectively decreases this pain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of aging on metoclopramide requirement for propofol-induced pain. METHODS: In a randomised, double-blind manner, 120 patients, 60 younger (aged 20-40 years) and 60 older (aged 60-80 years) adults, received placebo (saline) or metoclopramide intravenously at two different doses (2.5mg and 5 mg) [younger group n = 20 each, older group n = 20 each], with venous occlusion for 1 minute, followed by administration of propofol 0.5 mg/kg into a dorsal hand vein. A blinded researcher asked the patient to assess the pain according to a pain score (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe) during injection of propofol. RESULTS: For younger patients, the incidence of propofol-induced pain was 30% in patients receiving metoclopramide 5mg (both p < 0.05), 70% in those receiving metoclopramide 2.5mg and 80% in those receiving placebo. The median pain score was lower in patients receiving metoclopramide 5mg (0) than in those receiving placebo (1.5) [p < 0.05]. For older patients, 15 patients (75%) complained of pain in the placebo group, compared with six (30%) in the metoclopramide 5mg group (p < 0.01) and seven (35%) in the metoclopramide 2.5mg group (p < 0.05). The median pain score was lower in patients receiving metoclopramide 5mg (0) [p < 0.01] or metoclopramide 2.5mg (0) [p < 0.05] than in those receiving placebo (1). CONCLUSION: This study showed that older patients require less metoclopramide, with venous occlusion for 1 minute, to reduce pain on injection of propofol than do younger patients.
Authors: C F Minto; T W Schnider; T D Egan; E Youngs; H J Lemmens; P L Gambus; V Billard; J F Hoke; K H Moore; D J Hermann; K T Muir; J W Mandema; S L Shafer Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 1997-01 Impact factor: 7.892