OBJECTIVES: Topical beta-blockers are contraindicated in obstructive pulmonary diseases (OPDs). In this study we aimed to evaluate through central or local electronic medical records (EMRs) the prescription patterns for topical ocular beta-blockers for patients with glaucoma and OPD treated by ophthalmologists. METHODS: The study was carried out at the Leumit Health Maintenance Organisation (HMO) in Israel. The physicians at the HMO all work with an EMR, either a central EMR incorporating data from primary-care physicians and consultants, or a local one. The study population included all HMO members who filled at least one prescription for antiglaucoma medications in 2004. The patients were divided into two groups: those with a previous diagnosis of OPD (ICD-9 codes 493) and those with no known diagnosis of OPD. RESULTS: 7481 patients consumed topical antiglaucoma medications during the study period, and 14.5% had a diagnosis of OPD. 798 OPD patients were treated by ophthalmologists, and of the 61.8% who were treated with topical beta-blockers, only 38 received betaxolol. In comparison with glaucoma patients without OPD, OPD patients received fewer beta-blockers (p < 0.001), more selective beta-blockers (p < 0.0001) and less timolol (p < 0.001). Of the OPD patients treated by ophthalmologists with a central EMR, 59.5% received beta-blockers in comparison with 66.4% treated by ophthalmologists with a local EMR (p = 0.06). OPD patients treated by ophthalmologists with a central EMR received more non-beta-blockers in comparison with patients treated by ophthalmologists with a local EMR (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Most patients with OPD and glaucoma continued to receive topical beta-blockers, mostly noncardioselective beta-blockers. A central EMR with a comprehensive and highly available medical history reduced the prescription of beta-blockers to OPD patients, but rates remained unacceptably high.
OBJECTIVES: Topical beta-blockers are contraindicated in obstructive pulmonary diseases (OPDs). In this study we aimed to evaluate through central or local electronic medical records (EMRs) the prescription patterns for topical ocular beta-blockers for patients with glaucoma and OPD treated by ophthalmologists. METHODS: The study was carried out at the Leumit Health Maintenance Organisation (HMO) in Israel. The physicians at the HMO all work with an EMR, either a central EMR incorporating data from primary-care physicians and consultants, or a local one. The study population included all HMO members who filled at least one prescription for antiglaucoma medications in 2004. The patients were divided into two groups: those with a previous diagnosis of OPD (ICD-9 codes 493) and those with no known diagnosis of OPD. RESULTS: 7481 patients consumed topical antiglaucoma medications during the study period, and 14.5% had a diagnosis of OPD. 798 OPDpatients were treated by ophthalmologists, and of the 61.8% who were treated with topical beta-blockers, only 38 received betaxolol. In comparison with glaucomapatients without OPD, OPDpatients received fewer beta-blockers (p < 0.001), more selective beta-blockers (p < 0.0001) and less timolol (p < 0.001). Of the OPDpatients treated by ophthalmologists with a central EMR, 59.5% received beta-blockers in comparison with 66.4% treated by ophthalmologists with a local EMR (p = 0.06). OPDpatients treated by ophthalmologists with a central EMR received more non-beta-blockers in comparison with patients treated by ophthalmologists with a local EMR (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Most patients with OPD and glaucoma continued to receive topical beta-blockers, mostly noncardioselective beta-blockers. A central EMR with a comprehensive and highly available medical history reduced the prescription of beta-blockers to OPDpatients, but rates remained unacceptably high.
Authors: Michelle Houde; Anne-Marie Castilloux; David Tingey; Alfred Assalian; Jacques LeLorier Journal: Can J Ophthalmol Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 1.882
Authors: Stefano A Gandolfi; John Lim; Ana Cristina Sanseau; Juan Camilo Parra Restrepo; Thomas Hamacher Journal: Adv Ther Date: 2014-11-28 Impact factor: 3.845