Literature DB >> 17163239

Efficacy and safety of 24 weeks of therapy with bendroflumethiazide 1.25 mg/day or 2.5 mg/day and potassium chloride compared with enalapril 10 mg/day and amlodipine 5 mg/day in patients with mild to moderate primary hypertension : a multicentre, randomised, open study.

S Rasmussen1, N Borrild, J Vang Andersen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of therapy with low-dose bendroflumethiazide 1.25 mg/day or 2.5 mg/day and potassium chloride was compared with that of enalapril 10 mg/day and amlodipine 5 mg/day in patients with mild to moderate primary hypertension. STUDY
DESIGN: This was a multicentre study in general practice with patients randomised in a double-blind fashion and on open-label treatment. After a washout phase that lasted 4-6 weeks, 312 patients with a diastolic blood pressure of between 100 and 115 mm Hg were randomised in a double-blind fashion to treatment with either bendroflumethiazide 1.25 mg/day and potassium chloride (n = 117), bendroflumethiazide 2.5 mg/day and potassium chloride (n = 60), amlodipine 5 mg/day (n = 61) or enalapril 10 mg/day (n = 60), all given once daily (numbers in parentheses indicate the intention-to-treat population, with a total of 298 patients). The primary efficacy parameter was the reduction in diastolic blood pressure. Effects on systolic blood pressure, heart rate, biochemical variables, adverse events and quality of life were studied as secondary efficacy parameters.
RESULTS: All treatments reduced diastolic blood pressure significantly; reductions were as follows: 6.8 mm Hg with bendroflumethiazide 1.25 mg/day, 9.1 mm Hg with bendroflumethiazide 2.5 mg/day, 10.8 mm Hg with amlodipine 5 mg/day and 6.8 mm Hg with enalapril 10 mg/day. The reduction in diastolic blood pressure on amlodipine was significantly greater than on bendroflumethiazide 1.25 mg/day and enalapril 10 mg/day (p = 0.013). The percentage of patients achieving a diastolic blood pressure of < 95 mm Hg was 34% (SD 4.4) with bendroflumethiazide 1.25 mg/day, 48% (SD 6.5) with bendroflumethiazide 2.5 mg/day (p = 0.075 vs bendroflumethiazide 1.25 mg/day), 57% (SD 6.3) with amlodipine 5 mg/day (p = 0.004 vs bendroflumethiazide 1.25 mg/day) and 41% (SD 6.4) with enalapril 10 mg/day (p = 0.41 vs bendroflumethiazide 1.25 mg/day) [mean reductions]. The effect on systolic blood pressure was similar with all treatments. No clinically significant changes occurred in heart rate, serum potassium, blood glucose, serum urate or serum cholesterol levels. The incidences of adverse events were similar in the low-dose bendroflumethiazide groups, with significantly higher incidences in the enalapril and amlodipine groups. Quality of life was similar in the different treatment groups, but the study had limited power to detect any difference in this parameter.
CONCLUSION: The present study has confirmed, in a general practice population, that low-dose bendroflumethiazide (bendroflumethiazide 1.25-2.5 mg/day) in combination with potassium chloride is a well tolerated and efficacious first-line treatment for patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17163239     DOI: 10.2165/00044011-200626020-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Drug Investig        ISSN: 1173-2563            Impact factor:   2.859


  14 in total

1.  The verdict from ALLHAT--thiazide diuretics are the preferred initial therapy for hypertension.

Authors:  Lawrence J Appel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-12-18       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  What is the most important component of blood pressure: systolic, diastolic or pulse pressure?

Authors:  Timo E Strandberg; Kaisu Pitkala
Journal:  Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Effect of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibition compared with conventional therapy on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertension: the Captopril Prevention Project (CAPPP) randomised trial.

Authors:  L Hansson; L H Lindholm; L Niskanen; J Lanke; T Hedner; A Niklason; K Luomanmäki; B Dahlöf; U de Faire; C Mörlin; B E Karlberg; P O Wester; J E Björck
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-02-20       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic: The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT).

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-12-18       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Diuretics--a risk in the long-term treatment of hypertensive patients?

Authors:  A Amery; W Birkenhäger; C Bulpitt; D Clement; P de Leeuw; M L Deruyttere; A de Schaepdryver; C Dollery; R Fagard; A Fletcher
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.844

6.  Morbidity and mortality in patients randomised to double-blind treatment with a long-acting calcium-channel blocker or diuretic in the International Nifedipine GITS study: Intervention as a Goal in Hypertension Treatment (INSIGHT).

Authors:  M J Brown; C R Palmer; A Castaigne; P W de Leeuw; G Mancia; T Rosenthal; L M Ruilope
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-07-29       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Randomised trial of effects of calcium antagonists compared with diuretics and beta-blockers on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertension: the Nordic Diltiazem (NORDIL) study.

Authors:  L Hansson; T Hedner; P Lund-Johansen; S E Kjeldsen; L H Lindholm; J O Syvertsen; J Lanke; U de Faire; B Dahlöf; B E Karlberg
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-07-29       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  A comparison of outcomes with angiotensin-converting--enzyme inhibitors and diuretics for hypertension in the elderly.

Authors:  Lindon M H Wing; Christopher M Reid; Philip Ryan; Lawrence J Beilin; Mark A Brown; Garry L R Jennings; Colin I Johnston; John J McNeil; Graham J Macdonald; John E Marley; Trefor O Morgan; Malcolm J West
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-02-13       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  A randomized comparison of a conventional dose, a low dose and alternate-day dosing of bendrofluazide in hypertensive patients.

Authors:  B Girvin; G D Johnston
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.844

10.  Double-blind, parallel, comparative study on quality of life during treatment with amlodipine or enalapril in mild or moderate hypertensive patients: a multicentre study.

Authors:  P Omvik; E Thaulow; O B Herland; I Eide; R Midha; R R Turner
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.844

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Thiazide Diuretic-Induced Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose: a Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Jill J Hall; Dean T Eurich; Danielle Nagy; Lisa Tjosvold; John-Michael Gamble
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 5.128

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.