Literature DB >> 17162174

An accurate and reproducible method for locating the joint line during a revision total knee arthroplasty.

Michael Mason1, Amy Belisle, Peter Bonutti, Frank R Kolisek, Arthur Malkani, Michael Masini.   

Abstract

Studies have shown that the position of the joint line has a direct effect on postoperative results, including range of motion, functional knee scores, and midflexion stability. Four anatomic landmarks were investigated as references for locating the joint line during a revision knee surgery--the medial femoral epicondyle, the fibular head, the tibial tubercle, and the inferior pole of the patella. Measurements from 6 cadaver knees identified the distance of each landmark to the joint line. These distances were used to design instruments to aid in the intraoperative positioning of the joint line. The instruments were validated on 94 primary total knees. The instrument referencing the medial epicondyle had 99% and 93% accuracy for locating the natural position of the joint line within 5 and 3 mm, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17162174     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.08.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  14 in total

1.  Reduction of Patella-baja and Pseudo-patella-baja Does Not Improve Range of Motion in Patients After Mega-TKA.

Authors:  Tilman Graulich; Caroline Kranz; Dafang Zhang; Marcus Oergel; Tarek Omar Pacha; Marco Haertle; Mohamed Omar; Christian Krettek; Martin Panzica
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  Comparison of joint line position changes after primary bilateral total knee arthroplasty performed using the navigation-assisted measured gap resection or gap balancing techniques.

Authors:  Han Jun Lee; Jae Sung Lee; Ho Joong Jung; Kwang Sup Song; Jae Jun Yang; Chi Woo Park
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Double metal tibial blocks augmentation in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kyu Sung Chung; Jin Kyu Lee; Hee Jae Lee; Choong Hyeok Choi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Joint line level in revision total knee replacement: assessment and functional results with an average of seven years follow-up.

Authors:  Arnaud Clavé; Goulven Le Henaff; Thomas Roger; Paul Maisongrosse; Christian Mabit; Frédéric Dubrana
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  A review of the design process for implantable orthopedic medical devices.

Authors:  G A Aitchison; D W L Hukins; J J Parry; D E T Shepherd; S G Trotman
Journal:  Open Biomed Eng J       Date:  2009-07-02

6.  The impact of joint line restoration on functional results after hinged knee prosthesis.

Authors:  Serdar Yilmaz; Deniz Cankaya; Alper Deveci; Ahmet Firat; Bulent Ozkurt; Murat Bozkurt
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.251

7.  The medial and lateral epicondyle as a reliable landmark for intra-operative joint line determination in revision knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  B Ozkurt; T Sen; D Cankaya; S Kendir; K Basarır; Y Tabak
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 5.853

8.  "Meniscal" scar as a landmark for the joint line in revision total knee replacement.

Authors:  Wasim Sardar Khan; Jagmeet Bhamra; Rhodri Williams; Rhidian Morgan-Jones
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2017-01-18

9.  Joint line restoration during revision total knee arthroplasty: an accurate and reliable method.

Authors:  Chantal Sadaka; Ziad Kabalan; Fadi Hoyek; Georges Abi Fares; Jean-Claude Lahoud
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-11-26

10.  Effect of Joint Line Elevation after Posterior-stabilized and Cruciate-retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty on Clinical Function and Kinematics.

Authors:  Song-Jie Ji; Yi-Xin Zhou; Xu Jiang; Zhi-Yuan Cheng; Guang-Zhi Wang; Hui Ding; Ming-Lei Yang; Zhong-Lin Zhu
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 2.628

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.