Literature DB >> 17162062

Quality of life for men receiving a second treatment for prostate cancer.

Shelley A Arredondo1, David M Latini, Natalia Sadetsky, Jun Kawakami, David J Pasta, Janeen DuChane, Peter R Carroll.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We assessed the impact of second treatment on health related quality of life for men with prostate cancer. This issue is important because second treatment resulting from prostate specific antigen recurrence has the potential to further negatively impact health related quality of life and affect the overall value of treatment. We compared differences in health related quality of life before and after second treatment for men who had asymptomatic prostate specific antigen recurrence with those who did not have biochemical failure.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Men in this analysis (897) had localized disease, initially underwent radical prostatectomy monotherapy, and completed at least 1 health related quality of life questionnaire before and after radical prostatectomy. In this cohort 175 men underwent second treatment (nonadjuvant). The Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form-36 and UCLA Prostate Cancer Index were used to measure health related quality of life. Associations between patient groups and time on health related quality of life were analyzed using repeated measures.
RESULTS: Men who received a second treatment presented with more severe disease before radical prostatectomy and had worse general health related quality of life. Although health related quality of life differed significantly with time for the 2 groups, most domains for the second treatment group improved or remained stable until 15 months before second treatment, at which point they declined. Scores in the sexual functioning and role-physical domains showed clinically and statistically significant patterns of decreasing with time.
CONCLUSIONS: Health related quality of life is affected following second treatment but starts to decline approximately 1 year before second treatment. Not all aspects of health related quality of life decreased at the same rate, so patients should be counseled that certain domains may be affected more by additional treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17162062     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.08.061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  4 in total

1.  Health related quality of life for men treated for localized prostate cancer with long-term followup.

Authors:  George J Huang; Natalia Sadetsky; David F Penson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 2.  Management of complications of androgen deprivation therapy in the older man.

Authors:  Supriya G Mohile; Karen Mustian; Kathryn Bylow; William Hall; William Dale
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 6.312

3.  Analysis of urological procedures in men who died from prostate cancer using a population-based approach.

Authors:  Kara Babaian; Matthew Truong; Jeremy Cetnar; Deanna S Cross; Fangfang Shi; Mark A Ritter; David F Jarrard
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 4.  Initial report of the cancer Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) sexual function committee: review of sexual function measures and domains used in oncology.

Authors:  Diana D Jeffery; Janice P Tzeng; Francis J Keefe; Laura S Porter; Elizabeth A Hahn; Kathryn E Flynn; Bryce B Reeve; Kevin P Weinfurt
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.