Literature DB >> 17161931

Double contrast barium enema: technique, indications, results and limitations of a conventional imaging methodology in the MDCT virtual endoscopy era.

Gian Andrea Rollandi1, Ennio Biscaldi, Enzo DeCicco.   

Abstract

The double contrast barium enema of the colon continues to be a diffused conventional radiological technique and allows for the diagnosis of neoplastic and inflammatory pathology. After the '70s, a massive initiative is undertaken to simplify, perfect and encode the method of the double contrast barium enema: Altaras from Germany, Miller from USA and Cittadini from Italy are responsible for the perfection of this technique in the last 30 years. The tailored patient preparation, a perfect technique of execution and a precise radiological documentation are essentials steps to obtain a reliable examination. The main limit of double contrast enema is that it considers the pathology only from the mucosal surface. In neoplastic pathology evaluation the main limit is the "T" parameter staging, but more limited are the "N" and "M" parameters evaluation. Today the double contrast technique continues to be a refined, sensitive and specific diagnostic method, moreover, diagnostic results cannot compete with the new CT multislice techniques (CT-enteroclysis and virtual colonoscopy) which can examine both the lumen and the wall of the colon. The double contrast is a cheap and simple examination but in the next future is predictably a progressive substitution of conventional radiology from new multislice techniques, because the cross sectional imaging is more frequently able to detect causes of the symptoms whether resulting both from colonic or non colonic origin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17161931     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.07.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  4 in total

1.  Ethical indications for radiological procedures: a clearer picture.

Authors:  Rhys Gareth Ellis Clement
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2012-03-20

2.  An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female anorectal dysfunction.

Authors:  Abdul H Sultan; Ash Monga; Joseph Lee; Anton Emmanuel; Christine Norton; Giulio Santoro; Tracy Hull; Bary Berghmans; Stuart Brody; Bernard T Haylen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Enteroclysis: Current clinical value.

Authors:  Adel Maataoui; Thomas J Vogl; Volkmar Jacobi; M Fawad Khan
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2013-07-28

Review 4.  [Screening of colorectal neoplasm].

Authors:  G Layer; J F Riemann
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 0.635

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.