Literature DB >> 17161713

Screening mammography at 40-49 years: regret or no regret?

Benjamin Djulbegovic1, Gary H Lyman.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2006        PMID： 17161713     DOI： 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69816-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN： 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


× No keyword cloud information.
  7 in total

1.  Uncertainty and equipoise: at interplay between epistemology, decision making and ethics.

Authors:  Benjamin Djulbegovic
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.378

2.  To screen or not to screen for breast cancer? How do modelling studies answer the question?

Authors:  R G Koleva-Kolarova; Z Zhan; M J W Greuter; T L Feenstra; G H De Bock
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Screening mammography for women aged 40 to 49 years at average risk for breast cancer: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2007-01-01

4.  How does age affect baseline screening mammography performance measures? A decision model.

Authors:  John D Keen; James E Keen
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2008-09-21       Impact factor: 2.796

5.  Many faces of rationality: Implications of the great rationality debate for clinical decision-making.

Authors:  Benjamin Djulbegovic; Shira Elqayam
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 2.431

6.  What is the point: will screening mammography save my life?

Authors:  John D Keen; James E Keen
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 2.796

7.  Rational decision making in medicine: Implications for overuse and underuse.

Authors:  Benjamin Djulbegovic; Shira Elqayam; William Dale
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 2.431
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.